linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] regulator: dt-bindings: Document the ena-gpios property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141128142938.GM7712@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:29:38 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] regulator: dt-bindings: Document the ena-gpios
 property

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:54:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On pią, 2014-11-28 at 11:21 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:09:44AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

> > > I understand your concerns here however I didn't want to overengineer
> > > this. Is the same GPIO (on more complex PMICs) used in different
> > > contexts? Like enable control and something more in the same time?

> > Yes, and it's often reprogrammable at runtime.

> I have doubts if generalized code could support such configuration...

That's pretty much my point.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)