[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141128152247.GR7712@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:22:47 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Flora Fu <flora.fu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Sandeep Nair <sandeep_n@...com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
"Joe.C" <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
Dongdong Cheng <dongdong.cheng@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] regulator: MT6397: Add support for MT6397
regulator
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0800, Flora Fu wrote:
> @@ -96,5 +97,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_WM8350) += wm8350-regulator.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_WM8400) += wm8400-regulator.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_WM8994) += wm8994-regulator.o
>
> -
> ccflags-$(CONFIG_REGULATOR_DEBUG) += -DDEBUG
Random whitespace change here...
> + /* For HW design, buck voltage control register has two parts.
> + * part 1: vsel_reg for register mode
> + * part 2: voselon_reg or hw control mode
> + * Both parts should be updated and sync when user set voltage.
> + */
Why does nothing else in the driver know about this "hw control mode" -
what does it actually mean, shouldn't it affect some of the other
operations?
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(rdev->regmap, info->desc.vsel_reg,
> + info->desc.vsel_mask, sel);
> + if (ret != 0) {
> + dev_err(&rdev->dev, "Failed to update vsel: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(rdev->regmap, info->voselon_reg,
Missing blank line between these blocks.
> +static int mt6397_buck_get_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
> +static int mt6397_regulator_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
> +{
To repeat my comments on the last version: please use the generic regmap
operations rather than copying them.
> + np = of_node_get(pdev->dev.parent->of_node);
> + if (!np)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + regulators = of_get_child_by_name(np, "regulators");
To further repeat my previous review comments:
| Define regulators_node and of_match in the regulator desc and you can
| remove both this table and all your DT matching code in the driver, the
| core will handle it for you.
Please don't ignore review comments.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists