[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417142619-14548-2-git-send-email-wangweidong1@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 10:43:38 +0800
From: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
To: <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: <wangweidong1@...wei.com>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] acpi-cpufreq: make the freq_table store the same freq value
As the initialized freq_tables maybe different from the p-states
values, so the array index is different as well.
Although in this case:
p-states value: [2400 2400 2000 ...], while the freq_tables:
[2400 2000 ... CPUFREQ_TABLE_END]. After setted the freqs 2000,
the perf->state is 3 while the freqs_table's index should be 2.
So when call the get_cur_freq_on_cpu, the freqs value we get
is 2400.
So, make the freq_table store the same value as well.
Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@...wei.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index b0c18ed..93634a4 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
/* table init */
for (i = 0; i < perf->state_count; i++) {
- if (i > 0 && perf->states[i].core_frequency >=
+ if (i > 0 && perf->states[i].core_frequency >
data->freq_table[valid_states-1].frequency / 1000)
continue;
--
1.7.12
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists