linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 09/30] alpha: Fix jiffies based cputime assumption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1417199040-21044-10-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:23:39 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 09/30] alpha: Fix jiffies based cputime assumption

That code wrongly assumes that cputime_t wraps jiffies_t. Lets use
the correct accessors/mutators.

In practice there should be no harm yet because alpha currently
only support tick based cputime accounting which is always jiffies
based.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
---
 arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c
index f9c732e..6358718 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/osf_sys.c
@@ -1138,6 +1138,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(osf_getrusage, int, who, struct rusage32 __user *, ru)
 {
 	struct rusage32 r;
 	cputime_t utime, stime;
+	unsigned int utime_jiffies, stime_jiffies;
 
 	if (who != RUSAGE_SELF && who != RUSAGE_CHILDREN)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -1146,14 +1147,18 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(osf_getrusage, int, who, struct rusage32 __user *, ru)
 	switch (who) {
 	case RUSAGE_SELF:
 		task_cputime(current, &utime, &stime);
-		jiffies_to_timeval32(utime, &r.ru_utime);
-		jiffies_to_timeval32(stime, &r.ru_stime);
+		utime_jiffies = cputime_to_jiffies(utime);
+		stime_jiffies = cputime_to_jiffies(stime);
+		jiffies_to_timeval32(utime_jiffies, &r.ru_utime);
+		jiffies_to_timeval32(stime_jiffies, &r.ru_stime);
 		r.ru_minflt = current->min_flt;
 		r.ru_majflt = current->maj_flt;
 		break;
 	case RUSAGE_CHILDREN:
-		jiffies_to_timeval32(current->signal->cutime, &r.ru_utime);
-		jiffies_to_timeval32(current->signal->cstime, &r.ru_stime);
+		utime_jiffies = cputime_to_jiffies(current->signal->cutime);
+		stime_jiffies = cputime_to_jiffies(current->signal->cstime);
+		jiffies_to_timeval32(utime_jiffies, &r.ru_utime);
+		jiffies_to_timeval32(stime_jiffies, &r.ru_stime);
 		r.ru_minflt = current->signal->cmin_flt;
 		r.ru_majflt = current->signal->cmaj_flt;
 		break;
-- 
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/