[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547A0D58.5020806@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:15:52 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Steven Honeyman <stevenhoneyman@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i8k: Add support for temperature sensor labels
On 11/29/2014 08:30 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Saturday 29 November 2014 17:24:08 Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 11/29/2014 08:04 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
>>> +static bool __init i8k_check_temp(int sensor)
>>> +{
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Check if temperature sensor type is valid.
>>> + *
>>> + * If it is valid then sensor should work. But some
>>> sensors are not + * available at any time. E.g GPU sensor
>>> on Optimus/PowerExpress/Enduro + * card does not work (or
>>> return bogus value) when card is turned off. + * So this
>>> function should not fail in this case. + */
>>> + err = i8k_get_temp_type(sensor);
>>> + if (err >= 0)
>>> + return true;
>>> +
>>
>> Are you sure this function is provided for all systems ?
>> I am a bit concerned that we may wrongly disable sensors this
>> way, especially on older systems.
>>
>
> I do not know if that function is provided on all systems. But
> this code does not disable sensors. If function fail, then we
> fallback to temperature read down. Return true means that we
> enable sensor.
>
You are right. Guess I didn't have enough coffee this morning.
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists