linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i8k: Fix temperature bug handling in i8k_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:44:36 +0100
From:	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Steven Honeyman <stevenhoneyman@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i8k: Fix temperature bug handling in i8k_get_temp()

On Sunday 30 November 2014 01:12:07 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/i8k.c b/drivers/char/i8k.c
> > index 7272b08..e34a019 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/i8k.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/i8k.c
> > @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int i8k_get_temp(int sensor)
> >
> >       int temp;
> >  
> >  #ifdef I8K_TEMPERATURE_BUG
> >
> > -     static int prev[4];
> > +     static int prev[4] = { I8K_MAX_TEMP+1, I8K_MAX_TEMP+1,
> > I8K_MAX_TEMP+1, I8K_MAX_TEMP+1 };
> 
> This results in a checkpatch warning. Please split, and add a
> space before and after '+'. Actually, I would suggest to use
> something something like
> 
> #define I8K_INVALID_TEMP        (I8K_MAX_TEMP + 1)
> 
> and to use it instead of hard-coding "I8K_MAX_TEMP + 1" in the
> code.

I will define I8K_INVALID_TEMP and use it instead I8K_MAX_TEMP.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)