lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 1 Dec 2014 10:38:38 +0100
From:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@...phandler.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/11] mfd: syscon: Add atmel-smc registers
 definition

Hi Lee,

Sorry for the late reply.

On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:57:28 +0000
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 05 Nov 2014, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> 
> > Atmel AT91 SoCs have a memory range reserved for SMC (Static Memory
> > Controller) configuration.
> > Expose those registers so that drivers can make use of the smc syscon
> > declared in at91 DTs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-smc.h | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 include/linux/mfd/syscon/atmel-smc.h
> 
> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> 
> Any idea who will take this set?

I guess you could take patch 1 to 4 and Nicolas would take the other
ones (unless there's a maintainer for memory controller drivers).
Or, if we don't want to have dependency issues, Nicolas can take all of
them.

Nicolas, any preference ?

Regards,

Boris

-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists