Date:	Mon,  1 Dec 2014 18:17:03 +0800
From:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:	mst@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	pagupta@...hat.com, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 0/5] virtio_net: enabling tx interrupts

Hello:

We used to orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This breaks
socket accounting and can lead serveral functions won't work, e.g:

- Byte Queue Limit depends on tx completion nofication to work.
- Packet Generator depends on tx completion nofication for the last
  transmitted packet to complete.
- TCP Small Queue depends on proper accounting of sk_wmem_alloc to work.

This series tries to solve the issue by enabling tx interrupts. To minize
the performance impacts of this, several optimizations were used:

- In guest side, virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed() was used to delay the tx
  interrupt untile 3/4 pending packets were sent.
- In host side, interrupt coalescing were used to reduce tx interrupts.

Performance test results[1] (tx-frames 16 tx-usecs 16) shows:

- For guest receiving. No obvious regression on throughput were
  noticed. More cpu utilization were noticed in few cases.
- For guest transmission. Very huge improvement on througput for small
  packet transmission were noticed. This is expected since TSQ and other
  optimization for small packet transmission work after tx interrupt. But
  will use more cpu for large packets.
- For TCP_RR, regression (10% on transaction rate and cpu utilization) were
  found. Tx interrupt won't help but cause overhead in this case. Using
  more aggressive coalescing parameters may help to reduce the regression.

Changes from RFC V3:
- Don't free tx packets in ndo_start_xmit()
- Add interrupt coalescing support for virtio-net
Changes from RFC v2:
- clean up code, address issues raised by Jason
Changes from RFC v1:
- address comments by Jason Wang, use delayed cb everywhere
- rebased Jason's patch on top of mine and include it (with some tweaks)

Please reivew. Comments were more than welcomed.

[1] Performance Test result:

Environment:
- Two Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5620 @ 2.40GHz machines connected back to back
  with 82599ES cards.
- Both host and guest were net-next.git plus the patch
- Coalescing parameters for the card:
  Adaptive RX: off  TX: off
  rx-usecs: 1
  rx-frames: 0
  tx-usecs: 0
  tx-frames: 0
- Vhost_net was enabled and zerocopy was disabled
- Tests was done by netperf-2.6
- Guest has 2 vcpus with single queue virtio-net

Results:
- Numbers of square brackets are whose significance is grater than 95%

Guest RX:

size/sessions/+throughput/+cpu/+per_cpu_throughput/
64/1/+2.0326/[+6.2807%]/-3.9970%/
64/2/-0.2104%/[+3.2012%]/[-3.3058%]/
64/4/+1.5956%/+2.2451%/-0.6353%/
64/8/+1.1732%/+3.5123%/-2.2598%/
256/1/+3.7619%/[+5.8117%]/-1.9372%/
256/2/-0.0661%/[+3.2511%]/-3.2127%/
256/4/+1.1435%/[-8.1842%]/[+10.1591%]/
256/8/[+2.2447%]/[+6.2044%]/[-3.7283%]/
1024/1/+9.1479%/[+12.0997%]/[-2.6332%]/
1024/2/[-17.3341%]/[+0.0000%]/[-17.3341%]/
1024/4/[-0.6284%]/-1.0376%/+0.4135%/
1024/8/+1.1444%/-1.6069%/+2.7961%/
4096/1/+0.0401%/-0.5993%/+0.6433%/
4096/2/[-0.5894%]/-2.2071%/+1.6542%/
4096/4/[-0.5560%]/-1.4969%/+0.9553%/
4096/8/-0.3362%/+2.7086%/-2.9645%/
16384/1/-0.0285%/+0.7247%/-0.7478%/
16384/2/-0.5286%/+0.3287%/-0.8545%/
16384/4/-0.3297%/-2.0543%/+1.7608%/
16384/8/+1.0932%/+4.0253%/-2.8187%/
65535/1/+0.0003%/-0.1502%/+0.1508%/
65535/2/[-0.6065%]/+0.2309%/-0.8355%/
65535/4/[-0.6861%]/[+3.9451%]/[-4.4554%]/
65535/8/+1.8359%/+3.1590%/-1.2825%/

Guest RX:
size/sessions/+throughput/+cpu/+per_cpu_throughput/
64/1/[+65.0961%]/[-8.6807%]/[+80.7900%]/
64/2/[+6.0288%]/[-2.2823%]/[+8.5052%]/
64/4/[+5.9038%]/[-2.1834%]/[+8.2677%]/
64/8/[+5.4154%]/[-2.1804%]/[+7.7651%]/
256/1/[+184.6462%]/[+4.8906%]/[+171.3742%]/
256/2/[+46.0731%]/[-8.9626%]/[+60.4539%]/
256/4/[+45.8547%]/[-8.3027%]/[+59.0612%]/
256/8/[+45.3486%]/[-8.4024%]/[+58.6817%]/
1024/1/[+432.5372%]/[+3.9566%]/[+412.2689%]/
1024/2/[-1.4207%]/[-23.6426%]/[+29.1025%]/
1024/4/-0.1003%/[-13.6416%]/[+15.6804%]/
1024/8/[+0.2200%]/[+2.0634%]/[-1.8061%]/
4096/1/[+18.4835%]/[-46.1508%]/[+120.0283%]/
4096/2/+0.1770%/[-26.2780%]/[+35.8848%]/
4096/4/-0.1012%/-0.7353%/+0.6388%/
4096/8/-0.6091%/+1.4159%/-1.9968%/
16384/1/-0.0424%/[+11.9373%]/[-10.7021%]/
16384/2/+0.0482%/+2.4685%/-2.3620%/
16384/4/+0.0840%/[+5.3587%]/[-5.0064%]/
16384/8/+0.0048%/[+5.0176%]/[-4.7733%]/
65535/1/-0.0095%/[+10.9408%]/[-9.8705%]/
65535/2/+0.1515%/[+8.1709%]/[-7.4137%]/
65535/4/+0.0203%/[+5.4316%]/[-5.1325%]/
65535/8/+0.1427%/[+6.2753%]/[-5.7705%]/

size/sessions/+trans.rate/+cpu/+per_cpu_trans.rate/
64/1/+0.2346%/[+11.5080%]/[-10.1099%]/
64/25/[-10.7893%]/-0.5791%/[-10.2697%]/
64/50/[-11.5997%]/-0.3429%/[-11.2956%]/
256/1/+0.7219%/[+13.2374%]/[-11.0524%]/
256/25/-6.9567%/+0.8887%/[-7.7763%]/
256/50/[-4.8814%]/-0.0338%/[-4.8492%]/
4096/1/-1.6061%/-0.7561%/-0.8565%/
4096/25/[+2.2120%]/[+1.0839%]/+1.1161%/
4096/50/[+5.6180%]/[+3.2116%]/[+2.3315%]/

Jason Wang (4):
  virtio_net: enable tx interrupt
  virtio-net: optimize free_old_xmit_skbs stats
  virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
  vhost_net: interrupt coalescing support

Michael S. Tsirkin (1):
  virtio_net: bql

 drivers/net/virtio_net.c        | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 drivers/vhost/net.c             | 200 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/uapi/linux/vhost.h      |  12 +++
 include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h |  12 +++
 4 files changed, 383 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists