[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-2ef84b3bb97f03332f0c1edb4466b1750dcf97b5@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 02:54:34 -0800
From: tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bp@...e.de, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode, AMD:
Do not use smp_processor_id() in preemtible context
Commit-ID: 2ef84b3bb97f03332f0c1edb4466b1750dcf97b5
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/2ef84b3bb97f03332f0c1edb4466b1750dcf97b5
Author: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
AuthorDate: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:12:21 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:51:05 +0100
x86, microcode, AMD: Do not use smp_processor_id() in preemtible context
Hand down the cpu number instead, otherwise lockdep screams when doing
echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/microcode/reload.
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: amd64-microcode/2470
caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x12/0x20
CPU: 1 PID: 2470 Comm: amd64-microcode Not tainted 3.18.0-rc6+ #26
...
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1417428741-4501-1-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd_early.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h
index b7b10b8..48a4802 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_amd.h
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static inline u16 find_equiv_id(struct equiv_cpu_entry *equiv_cpu_table,
extern int __apply_microcode_amd(struct microcode_amd *mc_amd);
extern int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu);
-extern enum ucode_state load_microcode_amd(u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size);
+extern enum ucode_state load_microcode_amd(int cpu, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size);
#define PATCH_MAX_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
extern u8 amd_ucode_patch[PATCH_MAX_SIZE];
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
index 8fffd84..bfbbe61 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static enum ucode_state __load_microcode_amd(u8 family, const u8 *data,
return UCODE_OK;
}
-enum ucode_state load_microcode_amd(u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size)
+enum ucode_state load_microcode_amd(int cpu, u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size)
{
enum ucode_state ret;
@@ -390,8 +390,8 @@ enum ucode_state load_microcode_amd(u8 family, const u8 *data, size_t size)
#if defined(CONFIG_MICROCODE_AMD_EARLY) && defined(CONFIG_X86_32)
/* save BSP's matching patch for early load */
- if (cpu_data(smp_processor_id()).cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index) {
- struct ucode_patch *p = find_patch(smp_processor_id());
+ if (cpu_data(cpu).cpu_index == boot_cpu_data.cpu_index) {
+ struct ucode_patch *p = find_patch(cpu);
if (p) {
memset(amd_ucode_patch, 0, PATCH_MAX_SIZE);
memcpy(amd_ucode_patch, p->data, min_t(u32, ksize(p->data),
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ static enum ucode_state request_microcode_amd(int cpu, struct device *device,
goto fw_release;
}
- ret = load_microcode_amd(c->x86, fw->data, fw->size);
+ ret = load_microcode_amd(cpu, c->x86, fw->data, fw->size);
fw_release:
release_firmware(fw);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd_early.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd_early.c
index 0667447..3d988a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd_early.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd_early.c
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_amd(void)
eax = cpuid_eax(0x00000001);
eax = ((eax >> 8) & 0xf) + ((eax >> 20) & 0xff);
- ret = load_microcode_amd(eax, container, container_size);
+ ret = load_microcode_amd(smp_processor_id(), eax, container, container_size);
if (ret != UCODE_OK)
retval = -EINVAL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists