lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:12:17 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Determination for the number of named function parameters (with SmPL)

Hello,

Would you like to know how many named function parameters are used in the source files?

How do you think about to try the following semantic query approach out a bit more?

@initialize:python@
@@
import sys
import sqlite3 as SQLite
connection = SQLite.connect(":memory:")
c = connection.cursor()
c.execute("""create table numbers (number integer)""")
delimiter = "|"

def store_number(count):
    """Add an integer to an internal list."""
    c.execute("""insert into numbers (number) values (?)""",
              (count, )
             )

@counting_parameters@
identifier work;
parameter list[number] pl;
type return_type;
@@
 return_type work(pl)
 {
  ...
 }

@script:python collection@
count << counting_parameters.number;
@@
store_number(count)

@finalize:python@
@@
c.execute("""select count(*) nr from numbers""")
result = c.fetchone()

if result[0] > 0:
   c.execute("""create index x on numbers (number)""")
   c.execute("select number, count(*) nr from numbers group by number")
   sys.stdout.write(delimiter.join( ("number", "counter") ))
   sys.stdout.write("\r\n")
   for result in c:
      sys.stdout.write(delimiter.join((str(result[0]),
                                       str(result[1])
                                      )))
      sys.stdout.write("\r\n")
else:
   sys.stderr.write("No result for this analysis!\n")

connection.close()



elfring@...ne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> XX=$(date) && spatch.opt -timeout 12 -sp-file list_parameter_numbers1.cocci -dir /usr/src/linux-stable > list_parameter_numbers1.txt 2> list_parameter_numbers1-errors.txt ; YY=$(date) && echo "$XX * $YY"
...
elfring@...ne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/Probe> cat list_parameter_numbers1.txt
number|counter
0|29
1|18261
2|15374
3|12237
4|8159
5|4339
6|2701
7|1183
8|518
9|260
10|146
11|83
12|42
13|21
14|9
15|7
16|2
17|4
18|1
21|1
22|1


Do you find such an analysis result from the source files for Linux 3.17.4
interesting for further considerations?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ