[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141201113340.GA545@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:33:40 +0200
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm/thp: Allocate transparent hugepages on local node
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 11:16:43AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> This make sure that we try to allocate hugepages from local node if
> allowed by mempolicy. If we can't, we fallback to small page allocation
> based on mempolicy. This is based on the observation that allocating pages
> on local node is more beneficial that allocating hugepages on remote node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/gfp.h | 4 ++++
> mm/huge_memory.c | 24 +++++++++---------------
> mm/mempolicy.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/gfp.h b/include/linux/gfp.h
> index 41b30fd4d041..fcbd017b4fb4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/gfp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gfp.h
> @@ -338,11 +338,15 @@ alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> extern struct page *alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> int node);
> +extern struct page *alloc_hugepage_vma(gfp_t gfp, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long addr, int order);
> #else
> #define alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order) \
> alloc_pages_node(numa_node_id(), gfp_mask, order)
> #define alloc_pages_vma(gfp_mask, order, vma, addr, node) \
> alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order)
> +#define alloc_hugepage_vma(gfp_mask, vma, addr, order) \
> + alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order)
> #endif
> #define alloc_page(gfp_mask) alloc_pages(gfp_mask, 0)
> #define alloc_page_vma(gfp_mask, vma, addr) \
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index de984159cf0b..7903eb995b7f 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -766,15 +766,6 @@ static inline gfp_t alloc_hugepage_gfpmask(int defrag, gfp_t extra_gfp)
> return (GFP_TRANSHUGE & ~(defrag ? 0 : __GFP_WAIT)) | extra_gfp;
> }
>
> -static inline struct page *alloc_hugepage_vma(int defrag,
> - struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> - unsigned long haddr, int nd,
> - gfp_t extra_gfp)
> -{
> - return alloc_pages_vma(alloc_hugepage_gfpmask(defrag, extra_gfp),
> - HPAGE_PMD_ORDER, vma, haddr, nd);
> -}
> -
> /* Caller must hold page table lock. */
> static bool set_huge_zero_page(pgtable_t pgtable, struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long haddr, pmd_t *pmd,
> @@ -796,6 +787,7 @@ int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long address, pmd_t *pmd,
> unsigned int flags)
> {
> + gfp_t gfp;
> struct page *page;
> unsigned long haddr = address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK;
>
> @@ -830,8 +822,8 @@ int do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> }
> return 0;
> }
> - page = alloc_hugepage_vma(transparent_hugepage_defrag(vma),
> - vma, haddr, numa_node_id(), 0);
> + gfp = alloc_hugepage_gfpmask(transparent_hugepage_defrag(vma), 0);
> + page = alloc_hugepage_vma(gfp, vma, haddr, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
> if (unlikely(!page)) {
> count_vm_event(THP_FAULT_FALLBACK);
> return VM_FAULT_FALLBACK;
> @@ -1119,10 +1111,12 @@ int do_huge_pmd_wp_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> spin_unlock(ptl);
> alloc:
> if (transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma) &&
> - !transparent_hugepage_debug_cow())
> - new_page = alloc_hugepage_vma(transparent_hugepage_defrag(vma),
> - vma, haddr, numa_node_id(), 0);
> - else
> + !transparent_hugepage_debug_cow()) {
> + gfp_t gfp;
> +
> + gfp = alloc_hugepage_gfpmask(transparent_hugepage_defrag(vma), 0);
> + new_page = alloc_hugepage_vma(gfp, vma, haddr, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER);
Should node of page we're handling wp-fault for be part of decision?
> + } else
> new_page = NULL;
>
> if (unlikely(!new_page)) {
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index e58725aff7e9..fa96af5b31f7 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -2041,6 +2041,46 @@ retry_cpuset:
> return page;
> }
>
> +struct page *alloc_hugepage_vma(gfp_t gfp, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long addr, int order)
> +{
> + struct page *page;
> + nodemask_t *nmask;
> + struct mempolicy *pol;
> + int node = numa_node_id();
Hm. What if the code will be preempted and scheduled on different node?
I'm not really familiar with mempolicy details and not sure if we should
care. Probably not.
> + unsigned int cpuset_mems_cookie;
> +
> +retry_cpuset:
> + pol = get_vma_policy(vma, addr);
> + cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin();
> +
> + if (pol->mode != MPOL_INTERLEAVE) {
> + /*
> + * For interleave policy, we don't worry about
> + * current node. Otherwise if current node is
> + * in nodemask, try to allocate hugepage from
> + * current node. Don't fall back to other nodes
> + * for THP.
> + */
The comment probably should be above "if ()", not below.
> + nmask = policy_nodemask(gfp, pol);
> + if (!nmask || node_isset(node, *nmask)) {
> + mpol_cond_put(pol);
> + page = alloc_pages_exact_node(node, gfp, order);
> + if (unlikely(!page &&
> + read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie)))
> + goto retry_cpuset;
> + return page;
> + }
> + }
> + mpol_cond_put(pol);
> + /*
> + * if current node is not part of node mask, try
> + * the allocation from any node, and we can do retry
> + * in that case.
> + */
> + return alloc_pages_vma(gfp, order, vma, addr, node);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * alloc_pages_current - Allocate pages.
> *
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists