| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1417434775.30245.29.camel@x220>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 12:52:55 +0100
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: at91: remove at91sam9263 legacy board support
On Wed, 2014-11-19 at 11:31 +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Remove legacy support for at91sam9rl boards.
> This include board files removal plus all legacy code for non DT boards
> support.
> Use the Device Tree for running this board with newer kernels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
> ---
There's some further cleanup possible after this patch. I noticed that
when it landed in today's linux-next (ie, next-20141201) as commit
4403ac46edcd ("ARM: at91: remove at91sam9263 legacy board support").
> arch/arm/configs/at91sam9263_defconfig | 151 ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig.non_dt | 21 -
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Makefile | 4 -
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c | 399 --------
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c | 1538 ------------------------------
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9263ek.c | 493 ----------
> 6 files changed, 2606 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/configs/at91sam9263_defconfig
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c
> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9263ek.c
>
>[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index cef0e2f57068..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c
> +++ /dev/null
>[...]
> -/* --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - * RTT
> - * -------------------------------------------------------------------- */
> -
> -static struct resource rtt0_resources[] = {
> - {
> - .start = AT91SAM9263_BASE_RTT0,
> - .end = AT91SAM9263_BASE_RTT0 + SZ_16 - 1,
> - .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> - }, {
> - .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> - }, {
> - .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> - }
> -};
> -
> -static struct platform_device at91sam9263_rtt0_device = {
> - .name = "at91_rtt",
> - .id = 0,
> - .resource = rtt0_resources,
> -};
> -
> -static struct resource rtt1_resources[] = {
> - {
> - .start = AT91SAM9263_BASE_RTT1,
> - .end = AT91SAM9263_BASE_RTT1 + SZ_16 - 1,
> - .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> - }, {
> - .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> - }, {
> - .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> - }
> -};
> -
> -static struct platform_device at91sam9263_rtt1_device = {
> - .name = "at91_rtt",
> - .id = 1,
> - .resource = rtt1_resources,
> -};
> -
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9)
> -static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void)
> -{
> - struct platform_device *pdev;
> - struct resource *r;
> -
> - switch (CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9_RTT) {
This and...
> - case 0:
> - /*
> - * The second resource is needed only for the chosen RTT:
> - * GPBR will serve as the storage for RTC time offset
> - */
> - at91sam9263_rtt0_device.num_resources = 3;
> - at91sam9263_rtt1_device.num_resources = 1;
> - pdev = &at91sam9263_rtt0_device;
> - r = rtt0_resources;
> - break;
> - case 1:
> - at91sam9263_rtt0_device.num_resources = 1;
> - at91sam9263_rtt1_device.num_resources = 3;
> - pdev = &at91sam9263_rtt1_device;
> - r = rtt1_resources;
> - break;
> - default:
> - pr_err("at91sam9263: only supports 2 RTT (%d)\n",
> - CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9_RTT);
this are the only places were the Kconfig symbol RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9_RTT
was used. It is useless now. That matches its help text, that reads:
This option is only relevant for legacy board support and
won't be used when booting a DT board.
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - pdev->name = "rtc-at91sam9";
> - r[1].start = AT91SAM9263_BASE_GPBR + 4 * CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AT91SAM9_GPBR;
> - r[1].end = r[1].start + 3;
> - r[2].start = NR_IRQS_LEGACY + AT91_ID_SYS;
> - r[2].end = NR_IRQS_LEGACY + AT91_ID_SYS;
> -}
> -#else
> -static void __init at91_add_device_rtt_rtc(void)
> -{
> - /* Only one resource is needed: RTT not used as RTC */
> - at91sam9263_rtt0_device.num_resources = 1;
> - at91sam9263_rtt1_device.num_resources = 1;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
> -static void __init at91_add_device_rtt(void)
> -{
> - at91_add_device_rtt_rtc();
> - platform_device_register(&at91sam9263_rtt0_device);
> - platform_device_register(&at91sam9263_rtt1_device);
> -}
Is a patch to remove that symbol from drivers/rtc/Kconfig queued
somewhere?
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists