linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 07/12] drm: bridge/dw_hdmi: add support for multi-byte register width access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1417435456.4624.12.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:04:16 +0100
From:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:	Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
Cc:	airlied@...ux.ie, heiko@...ech.de, fabio.estevam@...escale.com,
	rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
	Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
	Zubair.Kakakhel@...tec.com, djkurtz@...gle.com, ykk@...k-chips.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, jay.xu@...k-chips.com,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, mark.yao@...k-chips.com,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/12] drm: bridge/dw_hdmi: add support for
 multi-byte register width access

Am Freitag, den 28.11.2014, 17:43 +0800 schrieb Andy Yan:
> Hi Zabel:
> On 2014年11月27日 00:34, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 26.11.2014, 21:32 +0800 schrieb Andy Yan:
> >> On rockchip rk3288, only word(32-bit) accesses are
> >> permitted for hdmi registers.  Byte width accesses (writeb,
> >> readb) generate an imprecise external abort.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes in v13: None
> >> Changes in v12: None
> >> Changes in v11: None
> >> Changes in v10: None
> >> Changes in v9: None
> >> Changes in v8: None
> >> Changes in v7: None
> >> Changes in v6:
> >> - refactor register access without reg_shift
> >>
> >> Changes in v5:
> >> - refactor reg-io-width
> >>
> >> Changes in v4: None
> >> Changes in v3:
> >> - split multi-register access to one indepent patch
> >>
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>   1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
> >> index a53bf63..5e88c8d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/dw_hdmi.c
> >> @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ struct hdmi_data_info {
> >>   	struct hdmi_vmode video_mode;
> >>   };
> >>   
> >> +union dw_reg_ptr {
> >> +	u32 __iomem *p32;
> >> +	u8 __iomem *p8;
> >> +};
> > I see no need to introduce this. Just explicitly multiply the offset in
> > dw_hdmi_writel.
> >
>      Is there any disadvantage to do like this?
>      The compiler can help us do the explicitly multiply by this way.

Four additional lines, a new defined type, a few more changes to struct
dw_hdmi and dw_hdmi_bind necessary.

Technically I see no problem to let the compiler do the multiplication,
my issue is that it ever so slightly obfuscates the code. Instead of
just writing "* 4" in two functions, we get a new union that you need to
know about when looking at struct dw_hdmi and dw_hdmi_bind, regs.p8 is
used but never assigned directly, it's just a tiny bit of additional
effort needed to understand the code. But when the cost to avoid that is
so small...

regards
Philipp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/