linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 16/46] virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:51:26 +0200
From:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Cc:	David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	rusty@....ibm.com, nab@...ux-iscsi.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
	thuth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/46] virtio_blk: v1.0 support

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 01:40:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:34:55 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 01:02:58PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:46:45 +0200
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:33:15PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 11:26:58 +0200
> > > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > For some places on data path, it might be worth it
> > > > > > to cache the correct value e.g. as part of device
> > > > > > structure. This replaces a branch with a memory load,
> > > > > > so the gain would have to be measured, best done
> > > > > > separately?
> > > > > 
> > > > > I think we'll want to do some measuring once the basic structure is
> > > > > in place anyway.
> > > > 
> > > > What's meant by in place here?
> > > 
> > > That this patchset is ready :)
> > 
> > Also it's ready to the level where benchmarking is possible, right?  I
> > don't think you should wait until we finish polishing up commit
> > messages.
> 
> My point is that I haven't even found time yet to test this
> thouroughly :(

If my experience shows anything, it's unlikely we'll get appropriate
testing without code being upstream first.
That's why I pushed on with sparse tagging btw.
This way we can be reasonably sure we didn't miss some path.

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/