[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141201130437.GB24737@amd>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 14:04:37 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, cooloney@...il.com, rpurdie@...ys.net,
sakari.ailus@....fi, s.nawrocki@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v8 02/14] Documentation: leds: Add description of LED
Flash class extension
Hi!
> >How are faults cleared? Should it be list of strings, instead of
> >bitmask? We may want to add new fault modes in future...
>
> Faults are cleared by reading the attribute. I will add this note.
> There can be more than one fault at a time. I think that the bitmask
> is a flexible solution. I don't see any troubles related to adding
> new fault modes in the future, do you?
I do not think that "read attribute to clear" is good idea. Normally,
you'd want the error attribute world-readable, but you don't want
non-root users to clear the errors.
I am not sure if bitmask is good solution. I'd return space-separated
strings like "overtemp". That way, there's good chance that other LED
drivers would be able to use similar interface...
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists