[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOiHx=nb4Ub_bseHUrz+HrnJxDEKMijQ=r+ASZ-p5MtTi81Big@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 17:09:04 +0100
From: Jonas Gorski <jogo@...nwrt.org>
To: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jon Fraser <jfraser@...adcom.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, computersforpeace@...il.com,
MIPS Mailing List <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 08/16] irqchip: Add new driver for BCM7038-style level
1 interrupt controllers
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 5:32 AM, Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com> wrote:
> This is the main peripheral IRQ controller on the BCM7xxx MIPS chips;
> it has the following characteristics:
>
> - 64 to 160+ level IRQs
> - Atomic set/clear registers
> - Reasonably predictable register layout (N status words, then N
> mask status words, then N mask set words, then N mask clear words)
> - SMP affinity supported on most systems
> - Typically connected to MIPS IRQ 2,3,2,3 on CPUs 0,1,2,3
>
> This driver registers one IRQ domain and one IRQ chip to cover all
> instances of the block. Up to 4 instances of the block may appear, as
> it supports 4-way IRQ affinity on BCM7435.
>
> The same block exists on the ARM BCM7xxx chips, but typically the ARM GIC
> is used instead. So this driver is primarily intended for MIPS STB chips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
> ---
> .../interrupt-controller/brcm,bcm7038-l1-intc.txt | 52 ++++
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 5 +
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c | 335 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 393 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/brcm,bcm7038-l1-intc.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/brcm,bcm7038-l1-intc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/brcm,bcm7038-l1-intc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cc217b22dccd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/brcm,bcm7038-l1-intc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +Broadcom BCM7038-style Level 1 interrupt controller
> +
> +This block is a first level interrupt controller that is typically connected
> +directly to one of the HW INT lines on each CPU. Every BCM7xxx set-top chip
> +since BCM7038 has contained this hardware.
> +
> +Key elements of the hardware design include:
> +
> +- 64, 96, 128, or 160 incoming level IRQ lines
> +
> +- Most onchip peripherals are wired directly to an L1 input
> +
> +- A separate instance of the register set for each CPU, allowing individual
> + peripheral IRQs to be routed to any CPU
> +
> +- Atomic mask/unmask operations
> +
> +- No polarity/level/edge settings
> +
> +- No FIFO or priority encoder logic; software is expected to read all
> + 2-5 status words to determine which IRQs are pending
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible: should be "brcm,bcm7038-l1-intc"
> +- reg: specifies the base physical address and size of the registers;
> + the number of supported IRQs is inferred from the size argument
> +- interrupt-controller: identifies the node as an interrupt controller
> +- #interrupt-cells: specifies the number of cells needed to encode an interrupt
> + source, should be 1.
> +- interrupt-parent: specifies the phandle to the parent interrupt controller(s)
> + this one is cascaded from
I'm not that firm in interrupt controller terminology, but can this be
a level 1 interrupt controller if it has a parent interrupt
controller? Isn't the parent the level 1 interrupt controller? Or
would the parent then be a level 0 interrupt controller? ;-)
Regards,
Jonas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists