[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547C95B8.7020300@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 17:22:16 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: x86: APIC fixes
On 27/11/2014 20:03, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> The interesting one is [3/4], which improves upon a previous CVE fix;
> we also handle logical destination wrapping in it, so [2/4] does the
> same for physical; and to make it nicer, [1/4] removes a condition.
> [4/4] makes our fast path return true when the message was handled.
>
> Radim Krčmář (4):
> KVM: x86: deliver phys lowest-prio
> KVM: x86: fix APIC physical destination wrapping
> KVM: x86: allow 256 logical x2APICs again
> KVM: x86: don't retry hopeless APIC delivery
>
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
So the order should be 1/2/5/3/4, right?
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists