[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547CAEA3.3090906@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 19:08:35 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: Robert Święcki <robert@...ecki.net>
CC: linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vyasevich@...il.com
Subject: Re: panic in skb_push via sctp
On 12/01/2014 07:02 PM, Robert Święcki wrote:
> Thanks for looking into it. I can try with your patch, but no
> guarantees that the fuzzer will hit the same condition in some
> reasonable time-frame. Will get back in some time with results.
Ok, thanks!
> PS. If you think it's possible to create a repro (userland code) which
> can trigger this, I can give it a try.
Did by accident trinity create tunnels? It looks that upper layer
protocols (except SCTP) all allocate and reserve MAX_HEADER to
accommodate enough head room in worst case for possible tunnels.
> 2014-12-01 18:36 GMT+01:00 Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>:
>> On 12/01/2014 05:49 PM, Robert Święcki wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't have much more, cause my kernel is kASLRNized and gdb cannot
>>> handle that, but pasting output from kdb. Maybe somebody will be able
>>> to see something obvious.
>>>
>>> <0>[93699.703244] skbuff: skb_under_panic: text:ffffffff83cff03e
>>> len:104 put:56 head:ffff8803bd804ec0 data:ffff8803bd804ebc tail:0x64
>>> end:0xc0 dev:<NULL>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the report!
>>
>> On a first view, it looks like we should be using MAX_HEADER instead
>> of LL_MAX_HEADER here, could you try with the following patch:
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
>> index 42dffd4..fc5e45b 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/output.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/output.c
>> @@ -401,12 +401,12 @@ int sctp_packet_transmit(struct sctp_packet *packet)
>> sk = chunk->skb->sk;
>>
>> /* Allocate the new skb. */
>> - nskb = alloc_skb(packet->size + LL_MAX_HEADER, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> + nskb = alloc_skb(packet->size + MAX_HEADER, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> if (!nskb)
>> goto nomem;
>>
>> /* Make sure the outbound skb has enough header room reserved. */
>> - skb_reserve(nskb, packet->overhead + LL_MAX_HEADER);
>> + skb_reserve(nskb, packet->overhead + MAX_HEADER);
>>
>> /* Set the owning socket so that we know where to get the
>> * destination IP address.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists