[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141201042844.GB11234@drongo>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 15:28:44 +1100
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] slab: Fix nodeid bounds check for non-contiguous node IDs
The bounds check for nodeid in ____cache_alloc_node gives false
positives on machines where the node IDs are not contiguous, leading
to a panic at boot time. For example, on a POWER8 machine the node
IDs are typically 0, 1, 16 and 17. This means that num_online_nodes()
returns 4, so when ____cache_alloc_node is called with nodeid = 16 the
VM_BUG_ON triggers, like this:
kernel BUG at /home/paulus/kernel/kvm/mm/slab.c:3079!
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]
SMP NR_CPUS=1024 NUMA PowerNV
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.18.0-rc5-kvm+ #17
task: c0000000013ba230 ti: c000000001494000 task.ti: c000000001494000
NIP: c000000000264f6c LR: c000000000264f5c CTR: 0000000000000000
REGS: c0000000014979a0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (3.18.0-rc5-kvm+)
MSR: 9000000002021032 <SF,HV,VEC,ME,IR,DR,RI> CR: 28000448 XER: 20000000
CFAR: c00000000047e978 SOFTE: 0
GPR00: c000000000264f5c c000000001497c20 c000000001499d48 0000000000000004
GPR04: 0000000000000100 0000000000000010 0000000000000068 ffffffffffffffff
GPR08: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 00000000082d0000 c000000000cca5a8
GPR12: 0000000048000448 c00000000fda0000 000001003bd44ff0 0000000010020578
GPR16: 000001003bd44ff8 000001003bd45000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000010
GPR24: c000000ffe000080 c000000000c824ec 0000000000000068 c000000ffe000080
GPR28: 0000000000000010 c000000ffe000080 0000000000000010 0000000000000000
NIP [c000000000264f6c] .____cache_alloc_node+0x6c/0x270
LR [c000000000264f5c] .____cache_alloc_node+0x5c/0x270
Call Trace:
[c000000001497c20] [c000000000264f5c] .____cache_alloc_node+0x5c/0x270 (unreliable)
[c000000001497cf0] [c00000000026552c] .kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0xdc/0x360
[c000000001497dc0] [c000000000c824ec] .init_list+0x3c/0x128
[c000000001497e50] [c000000000c827b4] .kmem_cache_init+0x1dc/0x258
[c000000001497ef0] [c000000000c54090] .start_kernel+0x2a0/0x568
[c000000001497f90] [c000000000008c6c] start_here_common+0x20/0xa8
Instruction dump:
7c7d1b78 7c962378 4bda4e91 60000000 3c620004 38800100 386370d8 48219959
60000000 7f83e000 7d301026 5529effe <0b090000> 393c0010 79291f24 7d3d4a14
To fix this, we instead compare the nodeid with MAX_NUMNODES, and
additionally make sure it isn't negative (since nodeid is an int).
The check is there mainly to protect the array dereference in the
get_node() call in the next line, and the array being dereferenced is
of size MAX_NUMNODES. If the nodeid is in range but invalid (for
example if the node is off-line), the BUG_ON in the next line will
catch that.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
---
v2: include the oops message in the patch description
mm/slab.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index eb2b2ea..f34e053 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -3076,7 +3076,7 @@ static void *____cache_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *cachep, gfp_t flags,
void *obj;
int x;
- VM_BUG_ON(nodeid > num_online_nodes());
+ VM_BUG_ON(nodeid < 0 || nodeid >= MAX_NUMNODES);
n = get_node(cachep, nodeid);
BUG_ON(!n);
--
2.1.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists