[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F07701677D8E@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 20:05:48 +0000
From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...el.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V6 1/3] perf tool: Add sort key symoff for perf diff
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 09:40:10AM -0500, Kan Liang wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > +static int64_t
> > +sort__symoff_collapse(struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry
> > +*right) {
> > + struct symbol *sym_l = left->ms.sym;
> > + struct symbol *sym_r = right->ms.sym;
> > + u64 symoff_l, symoff_r;
> > + int64_t ret;
> > +
> > + if (!sym_l || !sym_r)
> > + return cmp_null(sym_l, sym_r);
> > +
> > + ret = strcmp(sym_r->name, sym_l->name);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > +
> > + symoff_l = left->ip - sym_l->start;
> > + symoff_r = right->ip - sym_r->start;
> > +
> > + return (int64_t)(symoff_r - symoff_l); }
> > +
> > +static int hist_entry__symoff_snprintf(struct hist_entry *he, char *bf,
> > + size_t size, unsigned int width) {
> > + struct map *map = he->ms.map;
> > + struct symbol *sym = he->ms.sym;
> > + size_t ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (sym) {
> > + ret += repsep_snprintf(bf + ret, size - ret, "%s", sym-
> >name);
> > + ret += repsep_snprintf(bf + ret, size - ret, "+0x%llx",
> > + he->ip - sym->start);
> > +
> > + } else {
> > + size_t len = BITS_PER_LONG / 4;
> > +
> > + ret += repsep_snprintf(bf + ret, size - ret, "%-#.*llx", len,
> > + map ? map->unmap_ip(map, he->ip) :
> he->ip);
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret += repsep_snprintf(bf + ret, size - ret, "%-*s",
> > + width - ret, "");
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct sort_entry sort_symoff = {
> > + .se_header = "Symbol + Offset",
> > + .se_cmp = sort__symoff_cmp,
> > + .se_snprintf = hist_entry__symoff_snprintf,
> > + .se_width_idx = HISTC_SYMOFF,
> > +};
>
> I might have missed this in previous discussions, but do we also want just
> pure string comparison?
>
> now I get:
> 0.30% +0.42% main+0x110
> 1.80% -0.45% main+0x115
> 0.05% -0.04% main+0x118
> 0.34% +0.49% main+0x11c
> 2.15% -0.22% main+0x120
> 0.41% +0.22% main+0x123
> 1.86% +0.04% main+0x12f
> 3.86% -0.69% main+0x133
> 0.02% main+0x137
> 3.80% -1.19% main+0x13d
> 0.26% +0.45% main+0x141
> 2.26% +1.41% main+0x145
> 8.78% -1.59% main+0x148
> 0.05% main+0x14c
> 1.40% -0.26% main+0x155
> 0.07% main+0x158
> 0.74% -0.03% main+0x15b
> 1.06% -0.17% main+0x160
> 0.31% +0.30% main+0x1a8
> 1.82% -0.51% main+0x1af
> 0.09% +0.07% main+0x1b1
> 0.05% main+0x1b4
>
> could we add something like '-s symstr' to do only symbol string
> comparison, so the previous output would gather in single line like:
>
> 5.09% +2.07% main
Yes, we have a patch to do that.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/21/367
The default sort key "symbol" do symbols names comparison.
The symoff here is an extension in case anyone want to do deeper analysis.
Thanks,
Kan
>
>
> otherwise the patchset looks ok to me:
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
>
>
> thanks,
> jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists