[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417465745.28610.0.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 21:29:05 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
backports@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Subject: Re: net-PA Semi: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function
call "pci_dev_put"
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 02:34 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Some of those NULL pointer checks on input parameters may have been
> > added subsequently to functions. So there may be older kernel versions
> > out there in which those checks dont exists in some cases. If some of
> > the now "cleaned up" code is backported to such a kernel chances are
> > good that those missing checks are overseen. And then neither caller nor
> > callee is doing the NULL pointer check.
> I assume that a few backporters can tell you more about their corresponding
> software development experiences.
> http://www.do-not-panic.com/2014/04/automatic-linux-kernel-backporting-with-coccinelle.html
In such cases we just provide an appropriate wrapper and replace callers
of the original function by callers of the wrapper, typically with a
#define.
So this kind of evolution is no problem for the (automated) backports
using the backports project - although it can be difficult to detect
such a thing is needed.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists