linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] fs-fat: Less function calls in fat_fill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <547CDC1E.7020404@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Mon, 01 Dec 2014 22:22:38 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	trivial@...nel.org, Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs-fat: Less function calls in fat_fill_super() after
 error detection

>> Which names would be better acceptable for you?
> 
> You named it after the goto location but the label name should be based
> on the label location to say what the goto does.

I find it easier occasionally to name a label similarly to the jump target.
It seems that there are a few variations used for the affected identifiers.


> Something like "err_put_fsinfo", "err_put_fat", and "err_unload" or like that.

How do you think about to provide a patch with your preferred names
if my chances are lower to suggest the pleasing ones directly in my
first tries?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/