linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: zynq: DT: Add USB to device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <71b9e172438946a5ba74efb430d1418c@BN1AFFO11FD060.protection.gbl>
Date:	Mon, 1 Dec 2014 13:51:26 -0800
From:	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@...inx.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: zynq: DT: Add USB to device tree

Hi Arnd,

On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 10:26PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 01 December 2014 10:42:32 Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> > +       usb_phy0: usb-phy@0 {
> > +               compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
> > +               #phy-cells = <0>;
> > +       };
> >  };
> 
> As discussed in an unrelated thread today, please drop the "@0" in the
> node name, since the device has no 'reg' property.

What is the best practice for naming such nodes then? On these boards
it's not the case, but Zynq has two USB cores. So, there may be DTs that
will have two phys in there. Would we just do 'usb-phy-0'?

	Thanks,
	Sören
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/