lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547D69C2.20503@xs4all.nl>
Date:	Tue, 02 Dec 2014 08:26:58 +0100
From:	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
CC:	LMML <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: platform: add VPFE capture driver support for
 AM437X

On 12/01/2014 11:17 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> Hi Hans,
> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks for the patch, review comments are below.
>>
>> For the next version I would appreciate if someone can test this driver with
>> the latest v4l2-compliance from the v4l-utils git repo. If possible test streaming
>> as well (v4l2-compliance -s), ideally with both a sensor and a STD receiver input.
>> But that depends on the available hardware of course.
>>
>> I'd like to see the v4l2-compliance output. It's always good to have that on
>> record.
>>
> Following is the compliance output, missed it post it along with patch:
> 
> root@...37x-evm:~# ./v4l2-compliance -s -i 0 -v
> Driver Info:
>         Driver name   : vpfe
>         Card type     :[   70.363908] vpfe 48326000.vpfe:
> =================  START STATUS  =================
>  TI AM437x VPFE
>         Bus info      : platform:vpfe [   70.375576] vpfe
> 48326000.vpfe: ==================  END STATUS  ==================
> 48326000.vpfe
>         Driver version: 3.18.0
>         Capabil[   70.388485] vpfe 48326000.vpfe: invalid input index: 1
> ities  : 0x85200001
>                 Video Capture
>                 Read/Write
>                 Streaming
>                 Extended Pix Format
>                 Device Capabilities
>         Device Caps   : 0x05200001
>                 Video Capture
>                 Read/Write
>                 Streaming
>                 Extended Pix Format
> 
> Compliance test for device /dev/video0 (not using libv4l2):
> 
> Required ioctls:
>         test VIDIOC_QUERYCAP: OK
> 
> Allow for multiple opens:
>         test second video open: OK
>         test VIDIOC_QUERYCAP: OK
>         test VIDIOC_G/S_PRIORITY: OK
> 
> Debug ioctls:
>         test VIDIOC_DBG_G/S_REGISTER: OK (Not Supported)
>         test VIDIOC_LOG_STATUS: OK
> 
> Input ioctls:
>         test VIDIOC_G/S_TUNER/ENUM_FREQ_BANDS: OK (Not Supported)
>         test VIDIOC_G/S_FREQUENCY: OK (Not Supported)
>         test VIDIOC_S_HW_FREQ_SEEK: OK (Not Supported)
>         test VIDIOC_ENUMAUDIO: OK (Not Supported)
>         test VIDIOC_G/S/ENUMINPUT: OK
>         test VIDIOC_G/S_AUDIO: OK (Not Supported)
>         Inputs: 1 Audio Inputs: 0 Tuners: 0
> 
> Output ioctls:
>         test VIDIOC_G/S_MODULATOR: OK (Not Supported)
>         test VIDIOC_G/S_FREQUENCY: OK (Not Supported)
>         test VIDIOC_ENUMAUDOUT: OK (Not Supported)
>         test VIDIOC_G/S/ENUMOUTPUT: OK (Not Supported)
>         test VIDIOC_G/S_AUDOUT: OK (Not Supported)
>         Outputs: 0 Audio Outputs: 0 Modulators: 0
> 
> Input/Output configuration ioctls:
>         test VIDIOC_ENUM/G/S/QUERY_STD: OK
>         test VIDIOC_ENUM/G/S/QUERY_DV_TIMINGS: OK (Not Supported)
>         test VIDIOC_DV_TIMINGS_CAP: OK (Not Supported)
>         test VIDIOC_G/S_EDID: OK (Not Supported)
> 
> Test input 0:
> 
>         Control ioctls:
>                 test VIDIOC_QUERY_EXT_CTRL/QUERYMENU: OK (Not Supported)
>                 test VIDIOC_QUERYCTRL: OK (Not Supported)
>                 test VIDIOC_G/S_CTRL: OK (Not Supported)
>                 test VIDIOC_G/S/TRY_EXT_CTRLS: OK (Not Supported)
>                 test VIDIOC_(UN)SUBSCRIBE_EVENT/DQEVENT: OK (Not Supported)
>                 test VIDIOC_G/S_JPEGCOMP: OK (Not Supported)
>                 Standard Controls: 0 Private Controls: 0
> 
>         Format ioctls:
>                 info: found 7 framesizes for pixel format 56595559
>                 info: found 7 framesizes for pixel format 59565955
>                 info: found 7 framesizes for pixel format 52424752
>                 info: found 7 framesizes for pixel format 31384142
>                 info: found 4 formats for buftype 1
>                 test VIDIOC_ENUM_FMT/FRAMESIZES/FRAMEINTERVALS: OK
>                 test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: OK
>                 test VIDIOC_G_FBUF: OK (Not Supported)
>                 test VIDIOC_G_FMT: OK
>                 test VIDIOC_TRY_FMT: OK
>                 info: Global format check succeeded for type 1
>                 test VIDIOC_S_FMT: OK
>                 test VIDIOC_G_SLICED_VBI_CAP: OK (Not Supported)
> 
>         Codec ioctls:
>                 test VIDIOC_(TRY_)ENCODER_CMD: OK (Not Supported)
>                 test VIDIOC_G_ENC_INDEX: OK (Not Supported)
>                 test VIDIOC_(TRY_)DECODER_CMD: OK (Not Supported)
> 
>         Buffer ioctls:
>                 info: test buftype Video Capture
>                 test VIDIOC_REQBUFS/CREATE_BUFS/QUERYBUF: OK
>                 test VIDIOC_EXPBUF: OK
> 
> Streaming ioctls:
>         test read/write: OK
>             Video Capture:
>                 Buffer: 0 Sequence: 0 Field: None Timestamp: 74.956437s
>                 Buffer: 1 Sequence: 0 Field: None Timestamp: 74.979310s
>                 Buffer: 2 Sequence: 0 Field: None Timestamp: 75.002191s
>                 Buffer: 3 Sequence: 0 Field: None Timestamp: 75.208114s
>                 Buffer: 0 Sequence: 0 Field: None Timestamp: 75.230998s

Hmm, sequence is always 0. Is the sequence field set? And why doesn't
v4l2-compliance fail on this?

>                 Buffer: 1 Sequence: 0 Field: None Timestamp: 75.253877s

<snip>

>         test MMAP: OK
>         test USERPTR: OK (Not Supported)
>         test DMABUF: Cannot test, specify --expbuf-device
> 
> Total: 42, Succeeded: 42, Failed: 0, Warnings: 0
>>
> [Snip]

>>> +static int vpfe_enum_fmt(struct file *file, void  *priv,
>>> +                      struct v4l2_fmtdesc *f)
>>> +{
>>> +     struct vpfe_device *vpfe = video_drvdata(file);
>>> +     struct v4l2_subdev_mbus_code_enum mbus_code;
>>> +     struct vpfe_subdev_info *sdinfo;
>>> +     struct vpfe_fmt *fmt;
>>> +     int ret;
>>> +
>>> +     vpfe_dbg(2, vpfe, "vpfe_enum_format index:%d\n",
>>> +             f->index);
>>> +
>>> +     sdinfo = vpfe->current_subdev;
>>> +     if (!sdinfo->sd)
>>> +             return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +     mbus_code.index = f->index;
>>> +     ret = v4l2_subdev_call(sdinfo->sd, pad, enum_mbus_code,
>>> +                            NULL, &mbus_code);
>>> +     if (ret)
>>> +             return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> +     /* convert mbus_format to v4l2_format */
>>> +     fmt = find_format_by_code(mbus_code.code);
>>> +     if (!fmt) {
>>> +             vpfe_err(vpfe, "mbus code 0x%08x not found\n",
>>> +                     mbus_code.code);
>>> +             return -EINVAL;
>>> +     }
>>
>> Hmm. If a subdev supports more media bus codes then are supported by this
>> driver, then the enumeration will stop as soon as such an unsupported code
>> is found.
>>
>> What you want to do here is enumerate over the pixelformats that are supported
>> by both this driver and the subdev. It is probably something you want to
>> determine at the time the subdev is loaded and just mark unsupported formats
>> at that time so that they can be skipped here.
>>
> So probably populate the supported pixelformats in s_input call ,
> by calling enm_mbus_code ?

I would do this during driver initialization, it's a one time thing that can
be done there.

Regards,

	Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ