[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141202073440.GH4994@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 10:34:41 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
trivial@...nel.org, Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs-fat: Less function calls in fat_fill_super() after
error detection
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 10:22:38PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Which names would be better acceptable for you?
> >
> > You named it after the goto location but the label name should be based
> > on the label location to say what the goto does.
>
> I find it easier occasionally to name a label similarly to the jump target.
That is a useless thing to do.
> It seems that there are a few variations used for the affected identifiers.
There is a lot of crap code in the kernel, yes.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists