linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 1/7] ARM: probes: move all probe code to dedicate directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <547D9308.8080403@huawei.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Dec 2014 18:23:04 +0800
From:	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
CC:	<tixy@...aro.org>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>, <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/7] ARM: probes: move all probe code to dedicate
 directory

On 2014/12/2 12:59, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2014/12/01 17:48), Wang Nan wrote:
>> In discussion on LKML (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/28/158), Russell
>> King suggest to move all probe related code to arch/arm/probes. This
>> patch do the work. Due to dependency on 'arch/arm/kernel/patch.h', this
>> patch also move patch.h to 'arch/arm/include/asm/patch.h', and related
>> '#include' directive are also midified to '#include <asm/patch.h>'.
> 
> Moving is good to me, but renaming files are also required I think.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/Makefile                                |  1 +
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => include/asm}/patch.h         |  0
>>  arch/arm/kernel/Makefile                         | 16 ++--------------
>>  arch/arm/kernel/jump_label.c                     |  2 +-
>>  arch/arm/kernel/patch.c                          |  3 +--
>>  arch/arm/probes/Makefile                         | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-arm.c        |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-common.c     |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-test-arm.c   |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-test-thumb.c |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-test.c       |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-test.h       |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes-thumb.c      |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes.c            |  2 +-
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/kprobes.h            |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes-arm.c         |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes-arm.h         |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes-thumb.c       |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes-thumb.h       |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes.c             |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/probes.h             |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/uprobes-arm.c        |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/uprobes.c            |  0
>>  arch/arm/{kernel => probes}/uprobes.h            |  0
> 
> As I did on x86, these would be better renamed as expressing what they do.
> I guess most of the files may have emulate-*.c or decode-*.c :)
> 
> Thank you,
> 

OK. I posted another patch in this thread. The directory tree is as follow:

arch/arm/probes/
|-- Makefile
|-- decode-arm.c
|-- decode-arm.h
|-- decode-thumb.c
|-- decode-thumb.h
|-- decode.c
|-- decode.h
|-- kprobes
|   |-- actions-arm.c
|   |-- actions-common.c
|   |-- actions-thumb.c
|   |-- kprobes.c
|   |-- kprobes.h
|   |-- test-arm.c
|   |-- test-core.c
|   |-- test-core.h
|   `-- test-thumb.c
`-- uprobes
    |-- actions-arm.c
    |-- uprobes.c
    `-- uprobes.h

2 directories, 19 files

What do you think?

> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/