[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547D9E56.50708@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:11:18 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
<kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Olaf Hering <ohering@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: privcmd: schedule() after private hypercall
when non CONFIG_PREEMPT
On 01/12/14 22:36, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> Then I do agree its a fair analogy (and find this obviously odd that how
> widespread cond_resched() is), we just don't have an equivalent for IRQ
> context, why not avoid the special check then and use this all the time in the
> middle of a hypercall on the return from an interrupt (e.g., the timer
> interrupt)?
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/msg01101.html
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists