[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141202120824.GD22683@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:08:24 +0200
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] mm: memory: merge shared-writable dirtying branches
in do_wp_page()
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 05:58:02PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Whether there is a vm_ops->page_mkwrite or not, the page dirtying is
> pretty much the same. Make sure the page references are the same in
> both cases, then merge the two branches.
>
> It's tempting to go even further and page-lock the !page_mkwrite case,
> to get it in line with everybody else setting the page table and thus
> further simplify the model. But that's not quite compelling enough to
> justify dropping the pte lock, then relocking and verifying the entry
> for filesystems without ->page_mkwrite, which notably includes tmpfs.
> Leave it for now and lock the page late in the !page_mkwrite case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
This would conflict with other patchset of do_wp_page() cleanups, but look
good.
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists