[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY3vHHNSovaEf1UysuQD5gSHM-n6DUSdF372hYMyr9e8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:19:13 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: fix deferred probe detection for legacy API
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com> wrote:
> Commit 14e85c0e69d5 ("gpio: remove gpio_descs global array") changed
> gpio_to_desc()'s behavior to return NULL not only for GPIOs numbers
> not in the valid range, but also for all GPIOs whose controller has not
> been probed yet. Although this behavior is more correct (nothing hints
> that these GPIO numbers will be populated later), this affects
> gpio_request() and gpio_request_one() which call gpiod_request() with a
> NULL descriptor, causing it to return -EINVAL instead of the expected
> -EPROBE_DEFER for a non-probed GPIO.
>
> gpiod_request() is only called with a descriptor obtained from
> gpio_to_desc() from these two functions, so address the issue there.
>
> Other ways to obtain GPIOs rely on well-defined mappings and can thus
> return -EPROBE_DEFER only for relevant GPIOs, and are thus not affected
> by this issue.
>
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Patch applied with Geert's tested tag.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists