[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPs88r_6V_O_j8SrXAdkRZgLn=0BfZksK3e9=9xQGsjrqSZ+Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 01:31:56 +1100
From: Alex Dubov <alex.dubov@...il.com>
To: monstr@...str.eu
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: Wire up sendfd() syscall (all architectures)
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu> wrote:
> On 12/02/2014 09:01 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> This really needs a CC to linux-arch (added).
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Alex Dubov <alex.dubov@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Alex Dubov <oakad@...oo.com>
>>> ---
>
> The same for microblaze here
> arch/microblaze/include/asm/unistd.h
>
This invites the question as to why the __NR_syscalls macro is not
defined in uapi/asm/unistd.h on those architectures, where it will be
easier to spot? After all, asm/unistd.h includes uapi/asm/unistd.h
unconditionally.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists