[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547df364.236a8c0a.7b2d.ffffac67@mx.google.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 15:14:08 -0200
From: Dâniel Fraga <fragabr@...il.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: frequent lockups in 3.18rc4
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:04:07 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Is it harder to reproduce with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU=n?
Yes, it's much harder! :)
> If it is a -lot- harder to reproduce, it might be worth bisecting among
> the RCU read-side critical sections. If making a few of them be
> non-preemptible greatly reduces the probability of the bug occuring,
> that might provide a clue about root cause.
>
> On the other hand, if it is just a little harder to reproduce, this
> RCU read-side bisection would likely be an exercise in futility.
Ok, I want to bisect it. Since it could be painful to bisect,
could you suggest 2 commits between 3.16.0 and 3.17.0 so we can narrow
the bisect? I could just bisect between 3.16.0 and 3.17.0 but it would
take many days :).
Ps: if you prefer I bisect between 3.16.0 and 3.17.0, no
problem, but you'll have to be patient ;).
--
Linux 3.17.0-dirty: Shuffling Zombie Juror
http://www.youtube.com/DanielFragaBR
http://exchangewar.info
Bitcoin: 12H6661yoLDUZaYPdah6urZS5WiXwTAUgL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists