[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141201225725.1e94aa66@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 22:57:25 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Checking to see if a bit is _not_ set in a ftrace event filter
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 19:52:11 -0800
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com> wrote:
> yeah. teaching tree walk to do (state & 2048) == 0 is not trivial,
> since it doesn't have a concept of value of expression.
> Doing !(state & 2048) is probably a bit easier, since there
> are hacks for 'not' already.
That's exactly what I was looking at doing. If I can get something
working without spending more than an hour or two, I may even push it
for this release cycle.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists