[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547DFC30.304@opensource.altera.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:51:44 -0600
From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@...nsource.altera.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC: "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dougthompson@...ssion.com" <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
"m.chehab@...sung.com" <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com" <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"tthayer.linux@...il.com" <tthayer.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv5 5/5] arm: dts: Add Altera L2 Cache and OCRAM
EDAC
On 12/02/2014 09:01 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Thor,
>
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 08:47:41PM +0000, Thor Thayer wrote:
>> Hi Boris,
>>
>> On 11/18/2014 02:56 PM, Thor Thayer wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> On 11/11/2014 06:14 PM, tthayer@...nsource.altera.com wrote:
>>>> From: Thor Thayer<tthayer@...nsource.altera.com>
>>>>
>>>> Adding the device tree entries and bindings needed to support
>>>> the Altera L2 cache and On-Chip RAM EDAC. This patch relies upon
>>>> an earlier patch to declare and setup On-chip RAM properly.
>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg51117.html
>>>
>>> Any comments on these devicetree additions?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Thor
>>>> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer<tthayer@...nsource.altera.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> v2: Remove OCRAM declaration and reference prior patch.
>>>>
>>>> v3-5: No Change
>>>> ---
>>
>> I originally submitted this series on November 11, 2014.
>>
>> I haven't received any comments or ACKs on the device tree patch portion
>> (patch 5 of 5). According to
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt, if the patch
>> hasn't been Acked after a couple of weeks, the maintainer can pull the
>> changes if they are comfortable with those changes.
>
> Apologies it has taken so long for this to be looked at. Unfortunately
> my inbox is overflowing (as are all of ours) and things fall by the
> wayside. I am sorry that this has lead to such a delayed response,
> especially given that it was negative.
>
> I'll try to keep up with this a bit more actively.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
Hi Mark,
Thank you for reviewing this. I have seen how busy the device tree ML is
so I completely understand.
You have reviewed previous patch revisions in this series - thanks. I
thought that I'd addressed most of the issues (in some cases by
explaining my implementation) and since I hadn't heard anything, I
assumed there weren't concerns.
Thanks again,
Thor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists