[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141202180529.GB20314@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 19:05:29 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] oom: kill the insufficient and no longer needed
PT_TRACE_EXIT check
On 12/02, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> On Fri 28-11-14 00:04:08, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > After the previous patch we can remove the PT_TRACE_EXIT check in
> > oom_scan_process_thread(), it was added to handle the case when the
> > coredumping was "frozen" by ptrace, but it doesn't really work. If
> > nothing else, we would need to check all threads which could share
> > the same ->mm to make it more or less correct.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
>
> I still do not see why we do not need task->ptrace & PT_TRACE_EXIT check
> here. I do understand that the check on group_leader doesn't make much
> sense. ptrace_event would block until the tracer let the task run again
> which may be never AFAICS.
No, note that PT_TRACE_EXIT (the last ptrace event) is reported before
PF_EXITING is set.
(just in case... we do have some problems with SIGKILL && ptrace, but
this is completely off-topic and has nothing to do with oom-kill.c)
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists