[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141202184615.GA32622@laptop.dumpdata.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:46:15 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] swiotlb: Warn on allocation failure in
swiotlb_alloc_coherent
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:41:22PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:28:03PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 12:29:07PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> > >
> > > Print a warning when all allocation tries have been failed
> > > and the function is about to return NULL. This prepares for
> > > calling the function with __GFP_NOWARN to suppress
> > > allocation failure warnings before all fall-backs have
> > > failed.
> >
> > This can be quite noisy. Especially the dump-stack.
>
> Well, this is as noisy as the dump_stack()s from the page-allocator when
> the first allocation try fails. The goal of the first two patches in
Right, on the first allocation. Subsequent allocations won't be so noisy
in the page-allocator (I think?). While this will be noisy on subsequent
ones.
> this series is to only print a warning (with stack-trace) when
> alloc_coherent failed, and not when only an intermediate step failed
> that has a fall-back anyway (and might thus be no real problem).
>
>
> Joerg
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists