[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1417548000-1794-46-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 11:18:44 -0800
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 045/121] dm bufio: change __GFP_IO to __GFP_FS in shrinker callbacks
3.13.11-ckt12 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
commit 9d28eb12447ee08bb5d1e8bb3195cf20e1ecd1c0 upstream.
The shrinker uses gfp flags to indicate what kind of operation can the
driver wait for. If __GFP_IO flag is present, the driver can wait for
block I/O operations, if __GFP_FS flag is present, the driver can wait on
operations involving the filesystem.
dm-bufio tested for __GFP_IO. However, dm-bufio can run on a loop block
device that makes calls into the filesystem. If __GFP_IO is present and
__GFP_FS isn't, dm-bufio could still block on filesystem operations if it
runs on a loop block device.
The change from __GFP_IO to __GFP_FS supposedly fixes one observed (though
unreproducible) deadlock involving dm-bufio and loop device.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
index a42efc7..140be2d 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
@@ -1418,9 +1418,9 @@ static void drop_buffers(struct dm_bufio_client *c)
/*
* Test if the buffer is unused and too old, and commit it.
- * At if noio is set, we must not do any I/O because we hold
- * dm_bufio_clients_lock and we would risk deadlock if the I/O gets rerouted to
- * different bufio client.
+ * And if GFP_NOFS is used, we must not do any I/O because we hold
+ * dm_bufio_clients_lock and we would risk deadlock if the I/O gets
+ * rerouted to different bufio client.
*/
static int __cleanup_old_buffer(struct dm_buffer *b, gfp_t gfp,
unsigned long max_jiffies)
@@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@ static int __cleanup_old_buffer(struct dm_buffer *b, gfp_t gfp,
if (jiffies - b->last_accessed < max_jiffies)
return 0;
- if (!(gfp & __GFP_IO)) {
+ if (!(gfp & __GFP_FS)) {
if (test_bit(B_READING, &b->state) ||
test_bit(B_WRITING, &b->state) ||
test_bit(B_DIRTY, &b->state))
@@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ dm_bufio_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
unsigned long freed;
c = container_of(shrink, struct dm_bufio_client, shrinker);
- if (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO)
+ if (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)
dm_bufio_lock(c);
else if (!dm_bufio_trylock(c))
return SHRINK_STOP;
@@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ dm_bufio_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
unsigned long count;
c = container_of(shrink, struct dm_bufio_client, shrinker);
- if (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_IO)
+ if (sc->gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)
dm_bufio_lock(c);
else if (!dm_bufio_trylock(c))
return 0;
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists