lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 03 Dec 2014 07:13:10 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LinuxPPC-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] mm: Convert p[te|md]_numa users to
 p[te|md]_protnone_numa

On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 13:01 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, 2014-11-21 at 13:57 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >> void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
> >>                 pte_t pte)
> >>  {
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> >> -       WARN_ON(pte_val(*ptep) & _PAGE_PRESENT);
> >> -#endif
> >> +       /*
> >> +        * When handling numa faults, we already have the pte marked
> >> +        * _PAGE_PRESENT, but we can be sure that it is not in hpte.
> >> +        * Hence we can use set_pte_at for them.
> >> +        */
> >> +       VM_WARN_ON((pte_val(*ptep) & (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_USER)) ==
> >> +               (_PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_USER));
> >> +
> >
> > His is that going to fare with set_pte_at() called for kernel pages ?
> >
> 
> Yes, we won't capture those errors now. But is there any other debug
> check i could use to capture the wrong usage of set_pte_at ?

Actually the above is fine, for some reason I mis-read the test as
blowing on kernel pages, it doesn't.

We probably do need to make sure however that protnone isn't used for
kernel pages.

Cheers,
Ben.

> -aneesh
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ