[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417497975.4894.16.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 21:26:15 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next] udp: Neaten and reduce size of
compute_score functions
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 21:08 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 20:29 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > The compute_score functions are a bit difficult to read.
> >
> > Neaten them a bit to reduce object sizes and make them a
> > bit more intelligible.
> >
> > Return early to avoid indentation and avoid unnecessary
> > initializations.
> >
> > (allyesconfig, but w/ -O2 and no profiling)
>
> hmm... Not sure how you get such large numbers...
Nor I particularly, but I do with gcc 4.9.1
> > $ size net/ipv[46]/udp.o.*
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 28680 1184 25 29889 74c1 net/ipv4/udp.o.new
> > 28756 1184 25 29965 750d net/ipv4/udp.o.old
[]
> Here I have :
>
> # size net/ipv4/udp.o.*
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 21989 616 9 22614 5856 net/ipv4/udp.o.old
> 21957 616 9 22582 5836 net/ipv4/udp.o.new
Curious. What gcc version?
with that 4.9.1 gcc version and a defconfig (x86-64) I get:
$ size net/ipv[46]/udp.o*
text data bss dec hex filename
21328 672 9 22009 55f9 net/ipv4/udp.o.new
21312 672 9 21993 55e9 net/ipv4/udp.o.old
14463 588 2 15053 3acd net/ipv6/udp.o.new
14527 588 2 15117 3b0d net/ipv6/udp.o.old
and defconfig x86-32:
$ size net/ipv[46]/udp.o*
text data bss dec hex filename
19626 324 5 19955 4df3 net/ipv4/udp.o.new
19706 324 5 20035 4e43 net/ipv4/udp.o.old
14189 300 2 14491 389b net/ipv6/udp.o.new
14125 300 2 14427 385b net/ipv6/udp.o.old
> With CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y I even have an opposite result (code
> gets bigger after your patch)
>
> # size net/ipv4/udp.o.*
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 17242 600 9 17851 45bb net/ipv4/udp.o.old
> 17256 600 9 17865 45c9 net/ipv4/udp.o.new
>
> Anyway, your patch looks fine to me, no matter what the code size is.
>
> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists