[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1417645821-54731-7-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 23:30:18 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/9] arm64/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE READ_ONCE
ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)
Change the spinlock code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
index c45b7b1..cee1287 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -99,12 +99,12 @@ static inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
static inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
- return !arch_spin_value_unlocked(ACCESS_ONCE(*lock));
+ return !arch_spin_value_unlocked(READ_ONCE(*lock));
}
static inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
{
- arch_spinlock_t lockval = ACCESS_ONCE(*lock);
+ arch_spinlock_t lockval = READ_ONCE(*lock);
return (lockval.next - lockval.owner) > 1;
}
#define arch_spin_is_contended arch_spin_is_contended
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists