linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/9] mm: replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1417645821-54731-3-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed,  3 Dec 2014 23:30:14 +0100
From:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] mm: replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE or barriers

ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)

Let's change the code to access the page table elements with
READ_ONCE that does implicit scalar accesses.

mm_find_pmd is tricky, because m68k and sparc(32bit) define pmd_t
as array of longs. This code requires just that the pmd_present
and pmd_trans_huge check are done on the same value, so a barrier
is sufficent.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
---
 mm/gup.c    | 2 +-
 mm/memory.c | 2 +-
 mm/rmap.c   | 3 ++-
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
index cd62c8c..f2305de 100644
--- a/mm/gup.c
+++ b/mm/gup.c
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static int gup_pud_range(pgd_t *pgdp, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 
 	pudp = pud_offset(pgdp, addr);
 	do {
-		pud_t pud = ACCESS_ONCE(*pudp);
+		pud_t pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
 
 		next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
 		if (pud_none(pud))
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 3e50383..9e0c84e 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3202,7 +3202,7 @@ static int handle_pte_fault(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	pte_t entry;
 	spinlock_t *ptl;
 
-	entry = ACCESS_ONCE(*pte);
+	entry = READ_ONCE(*pte);
 	if (!pte_present(entry)) {
 		if (pte_none(entry)) {
 			if (vma->vm_ops) {
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 19886fb..1e54274 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -581,7 +581,8 @@ pmd_t *mm_find_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address)
 	 * without holding anon_vma lock for write.  So when looking for a
 	 * genuine pmde (in which to find pte), test present and !THP together.
 	 */
-	pmde = ACCESS_ONCE(*pmd);
+	pmde = *pmd;
+	barrier();
 	if (!pmd_present(pmde) || pmd_trans_huge(pmde))
 		pmd = NULL;
 out:
-- 
1.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/