linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] context_tracking: Restore previous state in schedule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALCETrVCwBw9zdcopZoVRnr-D-EYyjuXfqPu5OHnsc0LQJPxJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Dec 2014 15:26:01 -0800
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] context_tracking: Restore previous state in schedule_user

[adding Dave -- apparently git doesn't pick up Reported-By]

--Andy

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
> It appears that some SCHEDULE_USER (asm for schedule_user) callers
> in arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S are called from RCU kernel context,
> and schedule_user will return in RCU user context.  This causes RCU
> warnings and possible failures.
>
> This is intended to be a minimal fix suitable for 3.18.
>
> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Cc: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> ---
>
> Hi all-
>
> This is intended to be a suitable last-minute fix for the RCU issue that
> Dave saw.
>
> Dave, can you confirm that this fixes it?
>
> Frédéric, can you confirm that you think that this will have no effect
> on correct callers of schedule_user and that will do the right thing
> for incorrect callers of schedule_user?
>
> I don't like the x86 asm that calls this at all, and I don't really
> like the fragility of the mechanism is general, but I think that this
> improves the situation enough to avoid problems in the short term.
>
> With the obvious warning added, I get:
>
> [    0.751022] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    0.751937] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 72 at kernel/sched/core.c:2883 schedule_user+0xcf/0xe0()
> [    0.753477] Modules linked in:
> [    0.754089] CPU: 0 PID: 72 Comm: mount Not tainted 3.18.0-rc7+ #653
> [    0.755258] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.7.5-0-ge51488c-20140602_164612-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
> [    0.757655]  0000000000000009 ffff880005c13f00 ffffffff81741dca ffff8800069f5a50
> [    0.759228]  0000000000000000 ffff880005c13f40 ffffffff8108e781 0000000000000246
> [    0.760758]  0000000000000000 00007fff970441c8 00007fff97043fd0 00007f67794ebcc8
> [    0.762294] Call Trace:
> [    0.762775]  [<ffffffff81741dca>] dump_stack+0x46/0x58
> [    0.763739]  [<ffffffff8108e781>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xa0
> [    0.764865]  [<ffffffff8108e85a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
> [    0.765958]  [<ffffffff8174565f>] schedule_user+0xcf/0xe0
> [    0.766974]  [<ffffffff8174ae69>] sysret_careful+0x19/0x1c
> [    0.768011] ---[ end trace 329f34db2b3be966 ]---
>
> So, yes, we have a bug, and this could cause any number of strange
> problems.
>
>  kernel/sched/core.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 24beb9bb4c3e..39d9d95331b7 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -2874,10 +2874,14 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __sched schedule_user(void)
>          * or we have been woken up remotely but the IPI has not yet arrived,
>          * we haven't yet exited the RCU idle mode. Do it here manually until
>          * we find a better solution.
> +        *
> +        * NB: There are buggy callers of this function.  Ideally we
> +        * should warn if prev_state != IN_USER, but that will trigger
> +        * to frequently to make sense yet.
>          */
> -       user_exit();
> +       enum ctx_state prev_state = exception_enter();
>         schedule();
> -       user_enter();
> +       exception_exit(prev_state);
>  }
>  #endif
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>



-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/