[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547E7553.2050608@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 21:28:35 -0500
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Ashley Lai <ashley@...leylai.com>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>
CC: christophe.ricard@...il.com, josh.triplett@...el.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Will Arthur <will.c.arthur@...el.com>,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
jason.gunthorpe@...idianresearch.com,
trousers-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v8 6/8] tpm: TPM 2.0 baseline support
On 12/02/2014 05:31 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> +
> +/**
> + * tpm2_startup() - send startup command to the TPM chip
> + * @chip: TPM chip to use.
> + * @startup_type startup type. The value is either
> + * TPM_SU_CLEAR or TPM_SU_STATE.
> + *
> + * 0 is returned when the operation is successful. If a negative number is
> + * returned it remarks a POSIX error code. If a positive number is returned
> + * it remarks a TPM error.
> + */
> +int tpm2_startup(struct tpm_chip *chip, __be16 startup_type)
> +{
> + struct tpm2_cmd cmd;
> +
> + cmd.header.in = tpm2_startup_header;
> +
> + cmd.params.startup_in.startup_type = startup_type;
> + return tpm_transmit_cmd(chip, &cmd, sizeof(cmd),
> + "attempting to start the TPM");
> +}
I suppose you need to send this command because your firmware does not
do it ?Following TPM1.2 I guess the BIOS / UEFI should send this instead
and sending it later would actually be wrong. Hm, I don't find from
where you are calling this... do you need it ? Can you remove it?
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists