| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20141203000332.GD6207@localhost>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 16:03:32 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: "jeffrey.lin" <yajohn@...il.com>
Cc: rydberg@...omail.se, shc_work@...l.ru, bleung@...omium.org,
lee.jones@...aro.org, charliemooney@...omium.org, KP.li@...-ic.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
"jeffrey.lin" <jeffrey.lin@...-ic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver: input: touchscreen: add Raydium i2c touchscreen
driver
HI Jeffrey,
On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 06:17:11PM +0800, jeffrey.lin wrote:
> From: "jeffrey.lin" <jeffrey.lin@...-ic.com>
>
> This patch is porting Raydium I2C touch driver. Developer can enable
> raydium touch driver by modifying define "CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_RM_TS".
Thank you for making the changes requested earlier.
>
> Change-Id: I5f33cfdf0e895de6e7d535c11dd4b3ce8b49fa48
> Signed-off-by: jeffrey.lin@...-ic.com
> ---
> drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig | 12 +
> drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/input/touchscreen/rm31100_ts.c | 968 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/input/rm31100_ts.h | 60 ++
> 4 files changed, 1041 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/input/touchscreen/rm31100_ts.c
> create mode 100644 include/linux/input/rm31100_ts.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
> index 3ce9181..d0324d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
> @@ -955,4 +955,16 @@ config TOUCHSCREEN_ZFORCE
> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> module will be called zforce_ts.
>
> +config TOUCHSCREEN_RM_TS
> + tristate "Raydium I2C Touchscreen"
> + depends on I2C
> + help
> + Say Y here if you have Raydium series I2C touchscreen,
> + such as RM31100 , connected to your system.
> +
> + If unsure, say N.
> +
> + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> + module will be called rm31100_ts.
> +
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile
> index 687d5a7..aae4af2 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile
> @@ -78,3 +78,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_WM97XX_ZYLONITE) += zylonite-wm97xx.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_W90X900) += w90p910_ts.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_TPS6507X) += tps6507x-ts.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_ZFORCE) += zforce_ts.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_RM_TS) += rm31100_ts.o
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/rm31100_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/rm31100_ts.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6cb09a4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/rm31100_ts.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,968 @@
> +/* Source for:
> + * Raydium rm31100_ts Prototype touchscreen driver.
> + * drivers/input/touchscreen/rm31100_ts.c
No need for the file name. And we know it is a source. So just say:
Raydium RM31100 touchscreen driver.
Why does it say it's a prototype?
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2012,
Whose copyright is this?
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * version 2, and only version 2, as published by the
> + * Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * Raydium reserves the right to make changes without further notice
> + * to the materials described herein. Raydium does not assume any
> + * liability arising out of the application described herein.
> + *
> + * Contact Raydium Semiconductor Corporation at www.rad-ic.com
> + *
> + * History:
> + * (C) 2012 Raydium - Update for GPL distribution
> + * (C) 2009 Enea - Original prototype
> + *
> + */
> +#include <linux/async.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/input.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
We are not using workier anymore, please remove.
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/input/rm31100_ts.h>
> +#include <linux/pm.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +/*#include <plat/gpio-cfg.h>*/
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MISC_DEV
> +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> +#endif
> +/*#include <asm/uaccess.h> copy_to_user() */
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +
> +#define rm31100 0x0
> +#define rm3110x 0x1
> +
> +#define INVALID_DATA 0xff
> +#define MAX_REPORT_TOUCHED_POINTS 10
> +
> +#define TOUCHSCREEN_TIMEOUT (msecs_to_jiffies(10))
Does not seem to be used.
> +#define INITIAL_DELAY (msecs_to_jiffies(25000))
Does not seem to be used.
> +
> +#define EVAL_REPORT_RATE 1
> +
> +#define I2C_CLIENT_ADDR 0x39
> +#define I2C_DMA_CLIENT_ADDR 0x5A
> +#undef CONFIG_PM
What on earth is this????
> +struct rm31100_ts_data {
> + u8 x_index;
> + u8 y_index;
> + u8 z_index;
> + u8 id_index;
> + u8 touch_index;
> + u8 data_reg;
> + u8 status_reg;
> + u8 data_size;
> + u8 touch_bytes;
> + u8 update_data;
> + u8 touch_meta_data;
> + u8 finger_size;
> +};
> +
> +static struct rm31100_ts_data devices[] = {
> + [0] = {
> + .x_index = 2,
> + .y_index = 4,
> + .z_index = 6,
> + .id_index = 1,
> + .data_reg = 0x1,
> + .status_reg = 0,
> + .update_data = 0x0,/*0x4*/
> + .touch_bytes = 6,
> + .touch_meta_data = 1,
> + .finger_size = 70,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +struct rm31100_ts {
> + struct i2c_client *client;
> + struct input_dev *input;
> + struct delayed_work work;
We are not using work anymore, please remove.
> + struct rm3110x_ts_platform_data *pdata;
> + struct rm31100_ts_data *dd;
> + u8 *touch_data;
> + u8 device_id;
> + u8 prev_touches;
> + bool is_suspended;
> + bool int_pending;
> + struct mutex sus_lock;
> + struct mutex access_lock;
> + u32 pen_irq;
> +};
> +
> +struct rm31100_ts *pts;
> +/*
> +static inline u16 join_bytes(u8 a, u8 b)
> +{
> + u16 ab = 0;
> + ab = ab | a;
> + ab = ab << 8 | b;
> + return ab;
> +}
> +*/
> +static s32 rm31100_ts_write_reg_u8(struct i2c_client *client, u8 reg, u8 val)
> +{
> + s32 data;
> +
> + data = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg, val);
> + if (data < 0)
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "error %d in writing reg 0x%x\n",
> + data, reg);
> +
> + return data;
> +}
> +
> +static s32 rm31100_ts_read_reg_u8(struct i2c_client *client, u8 reg)
> +{
> + s32 data;
> +
> + data = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, reg);
> + if (data < 0)
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "error %d in reading reg 0x%x\n",
> + data, reg);
> +
> + return data;
> +}
> +
> +static int rm31100_ts_read(struct i2c_client *client, u8 reg, u8 *buf, int num)
> +{
> + struct i2c_msg xfer_msg[2];
> +
> + xfer_msg[0].addr = client->addr;
> + xfer_msg[0].len = 1;
> + xfer_msg[0].flags = 0;
> + xfer_msg[0].buf = ®
> +
> + xfer_msg[1].addr = client->addr;
> + xfer_msg[1].len = num;
> + xfer_msg[1].flags = I2C_M_RD;
> + xfer_msg[1].buf = buf;
> +
> + return i2c_transfer(client->adapter, xfer_msg, 2);
> +}
> +
> +static int rm31100_ts_write(struct i2c_client *client, u8 *buf, int num)
> +{
> + struct i2c_msg xfer_msg[1];
> +
> + xfer_msg[0].addr = client->addr;
> + xfer_msg[0].len = num;
> + xfer_msg[0].flags = 0;
> + xfer_msg[0].buf = buf;
> +
> + return i2c_transfer(client->adapter, xfer_msg, 1);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MISC_DEV
> +static int dev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&pts->access_lock);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int dev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> +{
> + mutex_unlock(&pts->access_lock);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static ssize_t
> +dev_read(struct file *filp, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + u8 *kbuf;
> + struct i2c_msg xfer_msg;
> + /*static char out[] = "1234567890";*/
> + /*static int idx;*//*= 0; remove by checkpatch*/
> + int i;
> +
> + kbuf = kmalloc(count, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (kbuf == NULL)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /*xfer_msg.addr = pts->client->addr;*/
> + xfer_msg.addr = I2C_CLIENT_ADDR;
> + xfer_msg.len = count;
> + xfer_msg.flags = I2C_M_RD;
> + xfer_msg.buf = kbuf;
> +
> + i2c_transfer(pts->client->adapter, &xfer_msg, 1);
> +
> + if (copy_to_user(buf, kbuf, count) == 0)
> + return count;
> + else
> + return -EFAULT;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t
> +dev_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *pos)
> +{
> + u8 *kbuf;
> + ssize_t status = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + kbuf = kmalloc(count, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (kbuf == NULL) {
> + dev_err("kmalloc() fail\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, count) == 0) {
> + pts->client->addr = I2C_CLIENT_ADDR;
> + if (rm31100_ts_write(pts->client, kbuf, count) < 0)
> + status = -EFAULT;
> + else
> + status = count;
> + } else {
> + dev_err("copy_from_user() fail\n");
> + status = -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + kfree(kbuf);
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> +static struct file_operations dev_fops = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .open = dev_open,
> + .release = dev_release,
> + .read = dev_read,
> + .write = dev_write,
> + /*.unlocked_ioctl = dev_ioctl,*/
> +};
> +
> +static struct miscdevice raydium_ts_miscdev = {
> + .minor = MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR,
> + .name = "raydium_ts",
> + .fops = &dev_fops,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> +
> +ssize_t show(struct device_driver *drv, char *buff)
> +{
> + struct i2c_msg xfer_msg;
> + int num = 10;
> + char buf[100];
> + /*int i;*/
> +
> + xfer_msg.addr = pts->client->addr;
> + xfer_msg.len = num;
> + xfer_msg.flags = I2C_M_RD;
> + xfer_msg.buf = buf;
> + pts->client->addr = I2C_CLIENT_ADDR;
> + i2c_transfer(pts->client->adapter, &xfer_msg, 1);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +ssize_t store(struct device_driver *drv, const char *buf, size_t count)
> +{
> + /*unsigned char pkt[] = { 0xF2, 5, 1, 1 };*/
> + unsigned char pkt[] = { 0xF1, 5, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0};
> +
> + pts->client->addr = I2C_CLIENT_ADDR;
> + rm31100_ts_write(pts->client, pkt, sizeof(pkt));
> +
> + return sizeof(pkt);
> +}
> +
> +DRIVER_ATTR(myAttr, 0x777, show, store);
> +
> +static void report_data(struct rm31100_ts *ts, u16 x, u16 y, u8 pressure, u8 id)
> +{
> + if (ts->pdata->swap_xy)
> + swap(x, y);
> +
> + /* handle inverting coordinates */
> + if (ts->pdata->invert_x)
> + x = ts->pdata->res_x - x;
> + if (ts->pdata->invert_y)
> + y = ts->pdata->res_y - y;
> +/*
> + input_report_abs(ts->input, ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID, id);
> + input_report_abs(ts->input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X, x);
> + input_report_abs(ts->input, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y, y);
> + input_report_abs(ts->input, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, pressure);
> + input_report_abs(ts->input, ABS_MT_WIDTH_MAJOR, ts->dd->finger_size);
> + input_mt_sync(ts->input);
> +*/
> +/*For protocol B*/
> + input_mt_slot(ts->input_dev, id);
> + input_mt_report_slot_state(ts->input_dev, MT_TOOL_FINGER, true);
> + input_report_abs(ts->input_dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_X, x);
> + input_report_abs(ts->input_dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y, y);
> + input_report_abs(ts->input_dev, ABS_MT_PRESSURE, pressure);
We do not need to use both A and B protocols, A is obsolete, please only use B.
> +/*
> + dev_dbg("%s(): id =%2hhd, x =%4hd, y =%4hd, pressure = %hhd\n",
> + __func__, id, x, y, pressure);
> +*/
> +}
> +
> +static void process_rm31100_data(struct RM31100_ts *ts)
> +{
> + u8 id, pressure, touches, i;
> + u16 x, y;
> +
> + touches = ts->touch_data[ts->dd->touch_index];
> +
> + if (touches > 0) {
> + for (i = 0; i < touches; i++) {
> + id = ts->touch_data[i * ts->dd->touch_bytes +
> + ts->dd->id_index];
> + pressure = ts->touch_data[i * ts->dd->touch_bytes +
> + ts->dd->z_index];
> + /*
> + x = join_bytes(ts->touch_data[i * ts->dd->touch_bytes +
> + ts->dd->x_index + 1],
> + ts->touch_data[i * ts->dd->touch_bytes +
> + ts->dd->x_index]);
> + y = join_bytes(ts->touch_data[i * ts->dd->touch_bytes +
> + ts->dd->y_index + 1],
> + ts->touch_data[i * ts->dd->touch_bytes +
> + ts->dd->y_index]);
> + */
> + x = get_unaligned_le16(ts->touch_data[i * ts->dd->
> + touch_bytes + ts->dd->x_index]);
> + y = get_unaligned_le16(ts->touch_data[i * ts->dd->
> + touch_bytes + ts->dd->y_index]);
> + report_data(ts, x, y, pressure, id);
> + }
> + } else
> + input_mt_sync(ts->input);
> +
> + ts->prev_touches = touches;
> + input_report_key(ts->input, BTN_TOUCH, 1);
> + input_sync(ts->input);
> +}
> +
> +static void rm31100_ts_xy_worker(struct work_struct *work)
Please rename now that it's not a worker anymore.
> +{
> + int rc;
> + u8 DMAAddress[4];
> + struct rm31100_ts *ts;
> +#if EVAL_REPORT_RATE
> + static struct timeval tv_start;
> + struct timeval tv_now;
> + static int cnt = -1;
> + int us;
> +#endif /* EVAL_REPORT_RATE*/
> +
> + /*dev_dbg("****rm31100_ts_xy_worker******\n");*/
> + mutex_lock(&ts->sus_lock);
> + if (ts->is_suspended == true) {
> + dev_dbg(&ts->client->dev, "TS is supended\n");
> + ts->int_pending = true;
> + mutex_unlock(&ts->sus_lock);
> + return;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&ts->sus_lock);
Now that we do not need worker to worry about, simply disable interrupt in suspend
and get rid of this checks/locks here.
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ts->access_lock);
> + /* read data from DATA_REG */
> + /*RM31100 DMA Mode*/
> + /*T010 OR w001+T012*/
> + DMAAddress[0] = 0x0F;
> + DMAAddress[1] = 0x00;
> + DMAAddress[2] = 0x20;
> + DMAAddress[3] = 0x81;/* Turn on DMA Mode*/
What does it mean "DMA mode"?
> + ts->client->addr = I2C_DMA_CLIENT_ADDR;
> + rc = rm31100_ts_write(ts->client, DMAAddress, 0x04);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(&ts->client->dev, "write failed\n");
> + goto schedule;
> + }
> + ts->client->addr = I2C_CLIENT_ADDR;
Do we really need to mess up with different I2C addresses here?
> + rc = rm31100_ts_read(ts->client, ts->dd->data_reg, ts->touch_data,
> + ts->dd->data_size);
> +
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(&ts->client->dev, "read failed\n");
> + goto schedule;
> + }
> +
> + if (ts->touch_data[ts->dd->touch_index] == INVALID_DATA)
> + goto schedule;
> +
> + /* write to STATUS_REG to release lock */
> + rc = rm31100_ts_write_reg_u8(ts->client,
> + ts->dd->status_reg, ts->dd->update_data);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(&ts->client->dev, "write failed, try once more\n");
> +
> + rc = rm31100_ts_write_reg_u8(ts->client,
> + ts->dd->status_reg, ts->dd->update_data);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + dev_err(&ts->client->dev, "write failed, exiting\n");
> + }
> +
> + process_rm31100_data(ts);
> +
> +#if EVAL_REPORT_RATE
> + cnt++;
> +
> + if (cnt == 0)/* first time this function is executed.*/
> + do_gettimeofday(&tv_start);
> + else if (cnt == 100) {
> + do_gettimeofday(&tv_now);
> + us = 1000000 * (tv_now.tv_sec - tv_start.tv_sec)
> + + tv_now.tv_usec - tv_start.tv_usec;
> + tv_start.tv_sec = tv_now.tv_sec;
> + tv_start.tv_usec = tv_now.tv_usec;
> + cnt = 0;
> + }
> +#endif /* EVAL_REPORT_RATE*/
Why do we need this?
> +schedule:
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&ts->access_lock);
> + /*dev_dbg("****Leave rm31100_ts_xy_worker******\n");*/
Please remove the commented out bits of code used during development.
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t rm31100_ts_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct rm31100_ts *ts = dev_id;
> +
> +/*For protocol B*/
> + input_sync(g_input_dev);
Why do we need the sync here for protocol B? This does not make sense.
> +
> + rm31100_ts_xy_worker(&ts->work);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int rm31100_ts_init_ts(struct i2c_client *client, struct rm31100_ts *ts)
> +{
> + struct input_dev *input_device;
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + ts->dd = &devices[ts->device_id];
> +
> + if (!ts->pdata->nfingers) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Touches information not specified\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (ts->device_id == rm3110x) {
> + if (ts->pdata->nfingers > 2) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Touches >=1 & <= 2\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + ts->dd->data_size = ts->dd->touch_bytes;
> + ts->dd->touch_index = 0x0;
> + } else if (ts->device_id == rm31100) {
> + if (ts->pdata->nfingers > 10) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Touches >=1 & <= 10\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + ts->dd->data_size = ts->pdata->nfingers * ts->dd->touch_bytes +
> + ts->dd->touch_meta_data;
> + ts->dd->touch_index = 0x0;
> + }
> + /* w001 */
> + else {
> + ts->dd->data_size = ts->pdata->nfingers * ts->dd->touch_bytes +
> + ts->dd->touch_meta_data;
> + ts->dd->touch_index = 0x0;
> + }
> +
> + ts->touch_data = kzalloc(ts->dd->data_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ts->touch_data) {
> + pr_err("%s: Unable to allocate memory\n", __func__);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int rm31100_ts_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct rm31100_ts *ts = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int rc = 0, i;
> +
> + if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
> + /* mark suspend flag */
> + mutex_lock(&ts->sus_lock);
> + ts->is_suspended = true;
> + mutex_unlock(&ts->sus_lock);
> +
> + enable_irq_wake(ts->pen_irq);
> + } else {
> + disable_irq_nosync(ts->pen_irq);
Why nosync?
> +/*For protocol B*/
> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_REPORT_TOUCHED_POINTS; i++) {
> + input_mt_slot(ts->input_dev, i);
> +
> + input_mt_report_slot_state(
> + ts->input_dev,
> + MT_TOOL_FINGER, false);
> +
> + input_report_key(
> + ts->input_dev,
> + BTN_TOOL_RUBBER, false);
> + }
> + input_sync(ts->input_dev);
This is weird indentation.
> +
> + if (rc) {
> + /* missed the worker, write to STATUS_REG to
> + acknowledge interrupt */
How would we miss a worker?
> + rc = rm31100_ts_write_reg_u8(ts->client,
> + ts->dd->status_reg, ts->dd->update_data);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(&ts->client->dev,
> + "write failed, try once more\n");
> +
> + rc = rm31100_ts_write_reg_u8(ts->client,
> + ts->dd->status_reg,
> + ts->dd->update_data);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + dev_err(&ts->client->dev,
> + "write failed, exiting\n");
> + }
> +
> + enable_irq(ts->pen_irq);
> + }
> +
> + gpio_free(ts->pdata->irq_gpio);
> +
> + if (ts->pdata->power_on) {
> + rc = ts->pdata->power_on(0);
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to goto suspend\n");
> + return rc;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rm31100_ts_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct rm31100_ts *ts = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
> + disable_irq_wake(ts->pen_irq);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ts->sus_lock);
> + ts->is_suspended = false;
> +
> + if (ts->int_pending == true)
> + ts->int_pending = false;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&ts->sus_lock);
> +
> + } else {
> + if (ts->pdata->power_on) {
> + rc = ts->pdata->power_on(1);
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_err(dev, "unable to resume\n");
> + return rc;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* configure touchscreen interrupt gpio */
> + rc = gpio_request(ts->pdata->irq_gpio, "rm31100_irq_gpio");
> + if (rc) {
> + pr_err("%s: unable to request gpio %d\n",
> + __func__, ts->pdata->irq_gpio);
> + goto err_power_off;
> + }
> + if (ts->pdata->irq_cfg) {
> + s3c_gpio_cfgpin(ts->pdata->irq_gpio,
> + ts->pdata->irq_cfg);
> + s3c_gpio_setpull(ts->pdata->irq_gpio,
> + S3C_GPIO_PULL_NONE);
> + }
> +
> + rc = gpio_direction_input(ts->pdata->irq_gpio);
> + if (rc) {
> + pr_err("%s: unable to set direction for gpio %d\n",
> + __func__, ts->pdata->irq_gpio);
> + goto err_gpio_free;
> + }
Why do we need to reconfigure the gpio on resume? Anyway, it should all be done
by board code/OF code.
> +
> + enable_irq(ts->pen_irq);
> +
> + /* Clear the status register of the TS controller */
> + rc = rm31100_ts_write_reg_u8(ts->client,
> + ts->dd->status_reg, ts->dd->update_data);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(&ts->client->dev,
> + "write failed, try once more\n");
> +
> + rc = rm31100_ts_write_reg_u8(ts->client,
> + ts->dd->status_reg,
> + ts->dd->update_data);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + dev_err(&ts->client->dev,
> + "write failed, exiting\n");
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +err_gpio_free:
> + gpio_free(ts->pdata->irq_gpio);
> +err_power_off:
> + if (ts->pdata->power_on)
> + rc = ts->pdata->power_on(0);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static struct dev_pm_ops rm31100_ts_pm_ops = {
> + .suspend = rm31100_ts_suspend,
> + .resume = rm31100_ts_resume,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
> +static int rm_input_dev_create(struct rm31100_ts *ts)
> +{
> + struct input_dev *input_device;
> + int rc = 0;
> + ts->prev_touches = 0;
> +
> + input_device = input_allocate_device();
> + if (!input_device) {
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> + goto error_alloc_dev;
> + }
> +
> + ts->input = input_device;
> + input_device->name = "raydium_ts"/*ts->pdata->ts_name*/;
> + input_device->id.bustype = BUS_I2C;
> + input_device->dev.parent = &client->dev;
> + input_set_drvdata(input_device, ts);
> +
> + __set_bit(EV_ABS, input_device->evbit);
> + __set_bit(INPUT_PROP_DIRECT, input_device->propbit);
> + /*__set_bit(EV_SYN, input_device->evbit);*/
> + /*__set_bit(BTN_TOUCH, input_device->keybit);*/
> +
> +
> + if (ts->device_id == rm31100) {
> + /* set up virtual key */
> + __set_bit(EV_KEY, input_device->evbit);
> + /* set dummy key to make driver work with virtual keys */
> + input_set_capability(input_device, EV_KEY, KEY_PROG1);
I have no idea what virtual keys are, we are not emitting KEY_PROG1 event
and so we should not be setting this capability.
> + }
> + /*For protocol B*/
> + input_mt_init_slots(input_device,
> + MAX_REPORT_TOUCHED_POINTS,
> + 0);
> + input_set_abs_params(input_device, ABS_MT_POSITION_X,
> + ts->pdata->dis_min_x, ts->pdata->dis_max_x, 0, 0);
> + input_set_abs_params(input_device, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y,
> + ts->pdata->dis_min_y, ts->pdata->dis_max_y, 0, 0);
> + input_set_abs_params(input_device, ABS_MT_PRESSURE,
> + 0, 0xFF, 0, 0);
> + /*input_set_abs_params(input_device, ABS_MT_TRACKING_ID,
> + ts->pdata->min_tid, ts->pdata->max_tid, 0, 0);*/
> + rc = input_register_device(input_device);
> + if (rc)
> + goto error_unreg_device;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +error_unreg_device:
> +error_wq_create:
> + input_free_device(input_device);
> +error_alloc_dev:
> + kfree(ts->touch_data);
This function did not allocate ts->touch_data, why does it try to free it?
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +static int rm31100_initialize(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct rm31100_ts *ts = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> + int rc = 0, retry_cnt = 0, temp_reg;
> + /* power on the device */
> + if (ts->pdata->power_on) {
> + rc = ts->pdata->power_on(1);
> + if (rc) {
> + pr_err("%s: Unable to power on the device\n", __func__);
> + goto error_dev_setup;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* read one byte to make sure i2c device exists */
> + if (ts->device_id == rm3110x)
> + temp_reg = 0x01;
> + else if (ts->device_id == rm31100)
> + temp_reg = 0x00;
> + else
> + temp_reg = 0x05;
> +
> + rc = rm31100_ts_read_reg_u8(client, temp_reg);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "i2c sanity check failed\n");
> + goto error_power_on;
> + }
> +
> + rc = rm31100_ts_init_ts(client, ts);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "rm31100_ts init failed\n");
> + goto error_mutex_destroy;
> + }
> +
> + if (ts->pdata->resout_gpio < 0)
> + goto config_irq_gpio;
Why do we need resout_gpio? I do not see the driver actually using it. Also I
do not see config_irq_gpio label defined. Does this driver even compile?
> +
> + /* configure touchscreen reset out gpio */
> + rc = gpio_request(ts->pdata->resout_gpio, "rm31100_resout_gpio");
> + if (rc) {
> + pr_err("%s: unable to request gpio %d\n",
> + __func__, ts->pdata->resout_gpio);
> + goto error_uninit_ts;
> + }
> +
> + rc = gpio_direction_output(ts->pdata->resout_gpio, 0);
> + if (rc) {
> + pr_err("%s: unable to set direction for gpio %d\n",
> + __func__, ts->pdata->resout_gpio);
> + goto error_resout_gpio_dir;
> + }
> + /* reset gpio stabilization time */
> + msleep(20);
> +
> + return 0;
> +error_resout_gpio_dir:
> + if (ts->pdata->resout_gpio >= 0)
> + gpio_free(ts->pdata->resout_gpio);
> +error_uninit_ts:
> + input_unregister_device(ts->input);
> + kfree(ts->touch_data);
> +error_mutex_destroy:
> + mutex_destroy(&ts->sus_lock);
> + mutex_destroy(&ts->access_lock);
> +error_power_on:
> +/* if (ts->pdata->power_on)
> + ts->pdata->power_on(0);*/
> +error_dev_setup:
> + if (ts->pdata->dev_setup)
> + ts->pdata->dev_setup(0);
> +
> +}
> +
> +static void rm_initialize_async(void *data, async_cookie_t cookie)
> +{
> + struct rm31100_ts *ts = data;
> + struct i2c_client *client = ts->client;
> + unsigned long irqflags;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ts->sus_lock);
> +
> + err = rm31100_initialize(client);
> + if (err < 0) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "probe failed! unbind device.\n");
> + goto error_free_mem;
> + }
> +
> + err = rm_input_dev_create(ts);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s crated failed, %d\n", __func__, err);
> + goto err_release;
> + }
> +
> + irqflags = client->dev.of_node ? 0 : IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING;
> +
> + err = request_threaded_irq(ts->pen_irq, NULL,
> + rm31100_ts_irq,
> + irqflags | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + ts->client->dev.driver->name, ts);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to register interrupt\n");
> + goto err_release;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&ts->sus_lock);
> +
> + return;
> +err_release:
> +error_free_mem:
> + kfree(ts);
> + mutex_unlock(&ts->sus_lock);
> + rm31100_ts_remove(client);
> + return;
> +}
> +
> +
> +/*static int __devinit rm31100_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)*/
> +static int rm31100_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> + struct rm31100_ts *ts;
> + struct rm3110x_ts_platform_data *pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
> + int rc/*, temp_reg*/;
> +
> + if (!pdata) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "platform data is required!\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
> + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_WORD_DATA)) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "I2C functionality not supported\n");
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> + /* Make sure there is something at this address */
> + if (i2c_smbus_xfer(client->adapter, client->addr, 0,
> + I2C_SMBUS_READ, 0, I2C_SMBUS_BYTE, &dummy) < 0)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + ts = kzalloc(sizeof(*ts), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ts)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + pts = ts;
> +
> + /* Enable runtime PM ops, start in ACTIVE mode */
> + rc = pm_runtime_set_active(&client->dev);
> + if (rc < 0)
> + dev_warn(&client->dev, "unable to set runtime pm state\n");
> + pm_runtime_enable(&client->dev);
> +
> + ts->client = client;
> + ts->pdata = pdata;
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, ts);
> + ts->device_id = id->driver_data;
> +
> + if (ts->pdata->dev_setup) {
> + rc = ts->pdata->dev_setup(1);
> + if (rc < 0) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "dev setup failed\n");
> + goto error_touch_data_alloc;
> + }
> + }
> +
> +
> + ts->is_suspended = false;
> + ts->int_pending = false;
> + mutex_init(&ts->sus_lock);
> + mutex_init(&ts->access_lock);
> +
> + async_schedule(rm_initialize_async, ts);
If you want to do async initialization you need to make sure you done before
trying to remove the driver, which you don't. For mainline I'd recommend
sticking to synchronous initialization - we'll have proper async probing done
by driver core soon.
> +
> + device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, ts->pdata->wakeup);
> + return 0;
> +error_reg_misc_dev:
> +error_req_irq_fail:
> +
> +error_resout_gpio_dir:
> + if (ts->pdata->resout_gpio >= 0)
> + gpio_free(ts->pdata->resout_gpio);
> +error_uninit_ts:
> + input_unregister_device(ts->input);
> + kfree(ts->touch_data);
> +error_mutex_destroy:
> + mutex_destroy(&ts->sus_lock);
> + mutex_destroy(&ts->access_lock);
> +error_power_on:
> +/* if (ts->pdata->power_on)
> + ts->pdata->power_on(0);*/
> +error_dev_setup:
> + if (ts->pdata->dev_setup)
> + ts->pdata->dev_setup(0);
> +error_touch_data_alloc:
> + pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);
> + pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
> + kfree(ts);
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> +/*static int __devexit RM31100_ts_remove(struct i2c_client *client)*/
> +static int __exit rm31100_ts_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> +{
> + struct rm31100_ts *ts = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> +
> + pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);
> + pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
> +
> + device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, 0);
> + free_irq(ts->pen_irq, ts);
> +
> + gpio_free(ts->pdata->irq_gpio);
> +
> + if (ts->pdata->resout_gpio >= 0)
> + gpio_free(ts->pdata->resout_gpio);
> + input_unregister_device(ts->input);
> +
> + mutex_destroy(&ts->sus_lock);
> + mutex_destroy(&ts->access_lock);
> +
> + if (ts->pdata->power_on)
> + ts->pdata->power_on(0);
> +
> + if (ts->pdata->dev_setup)
> + ts->pdata->dev_setup(0);
> +
> + kfree(ts->touch_data);
> + kfree(ts);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct i2c_device_id rm31100_ts_id[] = {
> + {"RM31100", rm31100},
> + {"RM3110x", rm3110x},
> + {}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, RM31100_ts_id);
> +
> +
> +static struct i2c_driver rm31100_ts_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "raydium_ts",/*rm31100_ts*/
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> + .pm = &rm31100_ts_pm_ops,
> +#endif
> + },
> + .probe = rm31100_ts_probe,
> + /*.remove = __devexit_p(RM31100_ts_remove),*/
> + .remove = __exit_p(rm31100_ts_remove),
No, it can't be __exit_p() at all.
> + .id_table = rm31100_ts_id,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init rm31100_ts_init(void)
> +{
> + int rc;
> + int rc2;
> +
> + rc = i2c_add_driver(&rm31100_ts_driver);
> +
> + rc2 = driver_create_file(&rm31100_ts_driver.driver,
> + &driver_attr_myAttr);
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +/* Making this as late init to avoid power fluctuations
> + * during LCD initialization.
> + */
> +late_initcall(RM31100_ts_init);
Hmm, this is unusual. Why do you have such big power fluctuations? How will yo
handle the case when both drivers are built as modules?
> +
> +static void __exit rm31100_ts_exit(void)
> +{
> + return i2c_del_driver(&RM31100_ts_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(RM31100_ts_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("rm31100-rm3110x touchscreen controller driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Raydium");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:rm31100_ts");
> diff --git a/include/linux/input/rm31100_ts.h b/include/linux/input/rm31100_ts.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..2397436
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/input/rm31100_ts.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
> +/* Header file for:
> + * Raydium rm31100 Prototype touchscreen driver.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2012, Raydium Semiconductor, Inc.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
> + * version 2, and only version 2, as published by the
> + * Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * Raydium reserves the right to make changes without further notice
> + * to the materials described herein. Raydium does not assume any
> + * liability arising out of the application described herein.
> + *
> + * Contact Raydium Semiconductor at www.rad-ic.com
> + *
> + * History:
> + * (C) 2012 Raydium - Update for GPL distribution
> + * (C) 2009 Enea - Original prototype
> + *
> + */
> +#ifndef __RM3110xTS_H__
> +#define __RM3110xTS_H__
> +
> +
> +/* rm3110x platform data
> + */
> +struct rm3110x_ts_platform_data {
> + int (*power_on)(int on);
> + int (*dev_setup)(bool on);
> + const char *ts_name;
> + u32 dis_min_x; /* display resoltion */
> + u32 dis_max_x;
> + u32 dis_min_y;
> + u32 dis_max_y;
> + u32 min_touch; /* no.of touches supported */
> + u32 max_touch;
> + u32 min_tid; /* track id */
> + u32 max_tid;
> + u32 min_width;/* size of the finger */
> + u32 max_width;
> + u32 res_x; /* TS resolution */
> + u32 res_y;
Why do we have separate display and touchscreen resolutions?
> + u32 swap_xy;
> + u32 flags;
What are the flags?
> + u16 invert_x;
> + u16 invert_y;
This should probable be done by userspace...
> + u8 nfingers;
> + u32 irq_gpio;
> + int resout_gpio;
> + bool wakeup;
> + u32 irq_cfg;
> +};
> +
> +#endif
> --
> 2.1.2
>
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists