linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH net-next] r8152: reduce memory copy for rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2ED360A@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw>
Date:	Wed, 3 Dec 2014 07:05:10 +0000
From:	Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] r8152: reduce memory copy for rx

Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 2:08 PM
[...]
> Better performance for what workload exactly ?

I test it by using Chariot with 4 Tx and 4 Rx.
It has about 4% improvement.

> cloning in rx path has many drawbacks, with skb->truesize 
> being usually wrong.

Excuse me. I find the skb_clone() would copy the
truesize from original skb. Do you mean the value
may not be suitable for the cloned skb?

Could other method do the same thing? Or, do you
think keeping the original one is better?
 
Best Regards,
Hayes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/