[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2ED364C@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw>
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 09:09:12 +0000
From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] r8152: reduce memory copy for rx
Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 3:15 PM
[...]
> Have you tried using more concurrent RX flows, in a possibly lossy
> environment (so that TCP is forced to queue packets in out of order
> queue) ?
I don't do the test. I would check it next time.
> skb cloning prevents GRO and TCP coalescing from working.
>
> netfilter might also be forced to copy whole frame in case a mangle is
> needed (eg with NAT ...)
>
> I would rather try to implement GRO, and/or using fragments instead of
> pure linear skbs.
>
> (skb->head would be around 128 or 256 bytes, and you attach to skb the
> frame as a page fragment)
Thanks for your response. I would study the GRO first.
Best Regards,
Hayes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists