[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <547ED391.1050507@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:10:41 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: ARM: DaVinci: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function
call "__clk_disable"
> The __clk_disable() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
I was a bit too quick to send you this notification. I stumbled once more
on the detail that my source code analysis approach is incomplete for
static functions so far.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm/mach-davinci/clock.c?id=a7ca2bcf2d2ef15c343a12f2a4c2e06380a0f495#n47
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/drivers/clk/clk.c?id=4dc7ed32f398fa76b9e1d243a852420b1dad0150#n846
I would like to apologise for confusion I introduced here.
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists