linux-kernel - Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v8 0/8] TPM 2.0 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1412030101400.16275@nanos>
Date:	Wed, 3 Dec 2014 01:03:43 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Peter Hüwe <PeterHuewe@....de>
cc:	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
	christophe.ricard@...il.com, josh.triplett@...el.com,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, Ashley Lai <ashley@...leylai.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jason.gunthorpe@...idianresearch.com,
	trousers-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v8 0/8] TPM 2.0 support

On Wed, 3 Dec 2014, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> From: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 00:18:52 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] tpm:tpm_i2c_nuvoton: simpyl return statements

simpyl?
 
> if !rc evals to false it is 0
> -> we can return rc in both cases

Why assigning rc and returning it when you can return the result of
tpm_chip_register() right away?
 
Thanks,

	tglx