[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5174649.NxPq80uDz8@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:46:34 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc: shawn.guo@...aro.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux@....linux.org.uk, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
jason@...edaemon.net, olof@...om.net, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mark.rutland@....com, pawel.moll@....com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] irqchip: gic: define register_routable_domain_ops conditional
On Wednesday 03 December 2014 01:12:02 Stefan Agner wrote:
> The inline function register_routable_domain_ops is only usable if
> CONFIG_ARM_GIC is set. Make it depend on this configuration. This
> also allows other SoC interrupt controller to provide such a
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
I don't think this is a good idea: either the interface is meant
to be generic and should work with any interrupt controller, or
it is specific to one irqchip and another irqchip should provide
a different interface that has a nonconflicting name.
I suppose you want the latter here, given that the declaration
is part of the gic specific header file.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists