lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 03 Dec 2014 11:56:29 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
	kernel@...gutronix.de, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
	olof@...om.net, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mark.rutland@....com, pawel.moll@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] ARM: vf610m4: add new machine and SoC for Vybrid on Cortex-M4

On Wednesday 03 December 2014 01:12:09 Stefan Agner wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index 89c4b5c..fdebe18 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -459,6 +459,18 @@ config ARCH_FOOTBRIDGE
>  	  Support for systems based on the DC21285 companion chip
>  	  ("FootBridge"), such as the Simtec CATS and the Rebel NetWinder.
>  
> +menuconfig ARCH_MXCM4
> +	bool "Freescale Vybrid/i.MX family on Cortex-M4" if !MMU
> +	select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> +	select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND if PM
> +	select CLKSRC_MMIO
> +	select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
> +	select PINCTRL
> +	select PM_OPP if PM
> +	select SOC_BUS
> +	help
> +	  Support for Freescale Vybrid/iMX-based family of processors on Cortex-M4
> +
>  config ARCH_NETX
>  	bool "Hilscher NetX based"
>  	select ARM_VIC

I would really prefer not to see any more standalone machine types,
but rather have ARMv7-M as one of the options for the
multiplatform configuration. In particular, that would let us
do *build* testing on a combined mxcm4/efm32/vexpress kernel,
although that kernel would clearly not be usable anywhere
because of the restrictions of nommu machines.

> +static void __init vf610m4_init_irq(void)
> +{
> +	vf610_mscm_init();
> +	irqchip_init();
> +}

Can you make vf610_mscm_init get called from irqchip and remove this
function?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ