linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 099/101] ext4: atomically set inode->i_flags in ext4_set_inode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <ec81c28104fd2198f076203be3d1bae5546e863f.1417605922.git.jslaby@suse.cz>
Date:	Wed,  3 Dec 2014 12:27:01 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	stable@...nel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 099/101] ext4: atomically set inode->i_flags in ext4_set_inode_flags()

From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit 5f16f3225b06242a9ee876f07c1c9b6ed36a22b6 upstream.

Use cmpxchg() to atomically set i_flags instead of clearing out the
S_IMMUTABLE, S_APPEND, etc. flags and then setting them from the
EXT4_IMMUTABLE_FL, EXT4_APPEND_FL flags, since this opens up a race
where an immutable file has the immutable flag cleared for a brief
window of time.

js: there is no change for ext4. This patch defines merely
    inode_set_flags for jffs in the next patch. I wonder why do we
    have both inode_set_flags and set_mask_bits? Looks like an
    improperly resolved merge conflict.

Reported-by: John Sullivan <jsrhbz@...argh.force9.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c    |  4 ++--
 fs/inode.c         | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/fs.h |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index a58a796bb92b..ba68d211d748 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -3970,8 +3970,8 @@ void ext4_set_inode_flags(struct inode *inode)
 		new_fl |= S_NOATIME;
 	if (flags & EXT4_DIRSYNC_FL)
 		new_fl |= S_DIRSYNC;
-	set_mask_bits(&inode->i_flags,
-		      S_SYNC|S_APPEND|S_IMMUTABLE|S_NOATIME|S_DIRSYNC, new_fl);
+	inode_set_flags(inode, new_fl,
+			S_SYNC|S_APPEND|S_IMMUTABLE|S_NOATIME|S_DIRSYNC);
 }
 
 /* Propagate flags from i_flags to EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags */
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 1e6e8468f2d8..d9134a0f5dd9 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -1871,3 +1871,34 @@ void inode_dio_done(struct inode *inode)
 		wake_up_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_DIO_WAKEUP);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_dio_done);
+
+/*
+ * inode_set_flags - atomically set some inode flags
+ *
+ * Note: the caller should be holding i_mutex, or else be sure that
+ * they have exclusive access to the inode structure (i.e., while the
+ * inode is being instantiated).  The reason for the cmpxchg() loop
+ * --- which wouldn't be necessary if all code paths which modify
+ * i_flags actually followed this rule, is that there is at least one
+ * code path which doesn't today --- for example,
+ * __generic_file_aio_write() calls file_remove_suid() without holding
+ * i_mutex --- so we use cmpxchg() out of an abundance of caution.
+ *
+ * In the long run, i_mutex is overkill, and we should probably look
+ * at using the i_lock spinlock to protect i_flags, and then make sure
+ * it is so documented in include/linux/fs.h and that all code follows
+ * the locking convention!!
+ */
+void inode_set_flags(struct inode *inode, unsigned int flags,
+		     unsigned int mask)
+{
+	unsigned int old_flags, new_flags;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(flags & ~mask);
+	do {
+		old_flags = ACCESS_ONCE(inode->i_flags);
+		new_flags = (old_flags & ~mask) | flags;
+	} while (unlikely(cmpxchg(&inode->i_flags, old_flags,
+				  new_flags) != old_flags));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_set_flags);
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 6535d5af027e..9cb726aa09fc 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -2496,6 +2496,9 @@ static inline ssize_t blockdev_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb,
 void inode_dio_wait(struct inode *inode);
 void inode_dio_done(struct inode *inode);
 
+extern void inode_set_flags(struct inode *inode, unsigned int flags,
+			    unsigned int mask);
+
 extern const struct file_operations generic_ro_fops;
 
 #define special_file(m) (S_ISCHR(m)||S_ISBLK(m)||S_ISFIFO(m)||S_ISSOCK(m))
-- 
2.1.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/